The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Employment with a human face: balancing efficiency, equity, and voice
Abstract
John W. Budd contends that the turbulence of the current workplace and the importance of work for individuals and society make it vitally important that employment be given "a human face." Contradicting the traditional view of the employment relationship as a purely economic transaction, with business wanting efficiency and workers wanting income, Budd argues that equity and voice are equally important objectives. The traditional narrow focus on efficiency must be balanced with employees' entitlement to fair treatment (equity) and the opportunity to have meaningful input into decisions (voice), he says. Only through a greater respect for these human concerns can broadly shared prosperity, respect for human dignity, and equal appreciation for the competing human rights of property and labor be achieved. Budd proposes a fresh set of objectives for modern democracies—efficiency, equity, and voice—and supports this new triad with an intellectual framework for analyzing employment institutions and practices. In the process, he draws on scholarship from industrial relations, law, political science, moral philosophy, theology, psychology, sociology, and economics, and advances debates over free markets, globalization, human rights, and ethics. He applies his framework to important employment-related topics, such as workplace governance, the New Deal industrial relations system, comparative industrial relations, labor union strategies, and globalization. These analyses create a found…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Inequality of bargaining power leads to less equitable outcomes for workers.
“IR scholars have argued that inequality of bargaining power leads to less equitable outcomes for workers (Barbash 1987; Budd 2004; Webb and Webb 1897).”
From Public Policy in a Time of Crisis: A Framework for Evaluating Canada’s COVID-19 Income Support Programs (2021) · cites this paper as Budd 2004
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kaufman, B. E. (2010) · ILR Review · doi:10.1177/001979391006400104 · Cited by 122
Koebel, K., Pohler, D., Gomez, R., & Mohan, A. (2021) · Canadian Public Policy · doi:10.3138/cpp.2020-117 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Budd, J. W.
- Corresponding author
- John W. Budd
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2004-09-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 42-0396-42-0396
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W2492169609
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- eCommons (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
- Social Sciences › Law › Labor Law and Work Dynamics
- Keywords
- employment, efficiency, equity, employee voice, labor relations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review