Cited by 103Employment, Labor, and Gender StudiesLegal and Labor StudiesLabor Law and Work Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Employment with a human face: balancing efficiency, equity, and voice

John W. Budd·2004·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

John W. Budd contends that the turbulence of the current workplace and the importance of work for individuals and society make it vitally important that employment be given "a human face." Contradicting the traditional view of the employment relationship as a purely economic transaction, with business wanting efficiency and workers wanting income, Budd argues that equity and voice are equally important objectives. The traditional narrow focus on efficiency must be balanced with employees' entitlement to fair treatment (equity) and the opportunity to have meaningful input into decisions (voice), he says. Only through a greater respect for these human concerns can broadly shared prosperity, respect for human dignity, and equal appreciation for the competing human rights of property and labor be achieved. Budd proposes a fresh set of objectives for modern democracies—efficiency, equity, and voice—and supports this new triad with an intellectual framework for analyzing employment institutions and practices. In the process, he draws on scholarship from industrial relations, law, political science, moral philosophy, theology, psychology, sociology, and economics, and advances debates over free markets, globalization, human rights, and ethics. He applies his framework to important employment-related topics, such as workplace governance, the New Deal industrial relations system, comparative industrial relations, labor union strategies, and globalization. These analyses create a found…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.42-0396

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Budd, J. W.
Corresponding author
John W. Budd
Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2004-09-01
Volume
42
Issue
01
Pages
42-0396-42-0396
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W2492169609
Cited by
103
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • eCommons (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Labor Law and Work Dynamics
Keywords
employment, efficiency, equity, employee voice, labor relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review