The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparing media systems: three models of media and politics
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2014) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9781137275844 · Cited by 300
The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies
(2019) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118841570 · Cited by 285
The Gatekeeping Function: Distributions of Information in Media and the Real World
Soroka, S. N. (2012) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s002238161100171x · Cited by 278
Counting Clicks: Quantification and Variation in Web Journalism in the United States and France
Christin, A. (2018) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/696137 · Cited by 266
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., John, P., Meijer, A., & Worthy, B. (2019) · Journal of Behavioral Public Administration · doi:10.30636/jbpa.12.34 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2004-11-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 42-1375-42-1375
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W4237406355
- Cited by
- 1,170
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing media systems: three models of media and politics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.42-1375
- The paper
- Comparing media systems: three models of media and politics. (2004). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.42-1375
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
