Cited by 52Administrative Law and GovernanceE-Government and Public ServicesPublic Policy and Administration Research

Do freedom of information laws increase transparency of government? A replication of a field experiment

Open access
Grimmelikhuijsen, Stephan, John, Peter, Meijer, Albert, Worthy, Ben·2019·Journal of Behavioral Public Administration

Abstract

Transparency and responsiveness are core values of democratic governments, yet do Freedom of Information Laws - one of the legal basis for such values - actually help to increase these values? This paper reports a replication of a field experiment testing for the responsiveness of public authorities by Worthy et al (2016) in the United Kingdom. We sent 390 information requests to Dutch local government bodies, half of which were framed as official FOIA requests, the other half as informal requests for information. We were able to reproduce the original findings, that is, we found a positive effect of FOIA requests on responsiveness. The overall response rate of local governments was much higher (76%) and the size of the effect was larger than in the original experiment. Furthermore, the strongest effect of FOI was found on proactive disclosure (concordance), something that governments - strictly speaking - are not obliged to do according to the Dutch FOIA. Implications for future replication studies are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.30636/jbpa.12.34

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • FOI laws have been enacted in many countries and have been found to increase government transparency in several countries.

    “FOI Acts have been enacted across the globe and have been found to effectively increase government transparency in several countries (e.g.Worthy, John, & Vannoni, 2017;Spac, Voda and Zagrapan 2018;Grimmelikhuijsen, John, Meijer, & Worthy, 2019).”

    From Latent transparency and trust in government: Unexpected findings from two survey experiments (2020) · cites this paper as Grimmelikhuijsen, John, Meijer, & Worthy, 2019

  • FOIA requests have been shown to have a significant positive effect on government transparency.

    “Also various studies have shown that FOIA requests have a significant positive effect on government transparency (e.g.Worthy et al., 2017;Spáč et al. 2018;Grimmelikhuijsen et al., 2019).”

    From Latent transparency and trust in government: Unexpected findings from two survey experiments (2020) · cites this paper as Grimmelikhuijsen et al., 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., John, P., Meijer, A., & Worthy, B.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
Venue
Journal of Behavioral Public Administration
Published
2019-01-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
ISSN
2576-6465 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2889135876
Cited by
52
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2
FWCI
17.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Behavioral Public Administration (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Administrative Law and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
Keywords
access to information law, government transparency, replication study, field experiments, information requests, local government, proactive disclosure, concordance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review