The DOI matches its Crossref record.
What things do: philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design
Abstract
Contents Preface and Acknowledgments Introduction: To the Things Themselves 1. The Death of Things 2. The Thing About the Philosophy of Technology 3. Toward a Philosophy of Artifacts Part I: Philosophy Beyond Things 1. Technology and the Self 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Technology and Mass-Rule 1.3 Human Beings and Mass Production 1.4 Mass Existence 1.5 The Neutrality of Technology 1.6 Conclusion 2. The Thing about Technology 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Heidegger's Philosophy of Technology 2.3 To Be or Not to Be-That Is the Question 2.4 Heidegger and Things 2.5 Conclusion Part II: Philosophy from Things 3. Postphenomenology 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Empirical Research into Technology 3.3 Beyond Classical Phenomenology 3.4 Toward a Postphenomenology of Things 4. A Material Hermeneutic 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Relations Between Human Beings and Artifacts 4.3 Mediation and Meaning 4.4 Artifacts, Culture, and Science 4.5 Conclusion 5. The Acts of Artifacts 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Latour's Amodern Ontology 5.3 Technical Mediation 5.4 Actor-Network Theory and Postphenomenology 5.5 Mediation of Action 5.6 Conclusion 6. Devices and the Good Life 6.1 Introduction 6.2 The Device Paradigm 6.3 Technology and the Good Life 6.4 Beyond Alienation 6.5 Mediated Engagement 6.6 Conclusion: The Mediation of Action and Experience Part III: Philosophy for Things 7. Artifacts in Design 7.1 Introduction 7.2 The Materiality of Things 7.3 Toward a Material Aesthetics 7.4 Durable Designs 7.5 Conclusion
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design
Bardzell, S. (2010) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1753326.1753521 · Cited by 1,123
Materializing Morality: Design Ethics and Technological Mediation
Verbeek, P.-P. (2006) · Science, Technology, & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243905285847 · Cited by 683
Technology, autonomy, and manipulation
Susser, D., Roessler, B., & Nissenbaum, H. (2019) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2019.2.1410 · Cited by 474
Embodied cognition and the magical future of interaction design
Kirsh, D. (2013) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/2442106.2442109 · Cited by 465
Cyborg intentionality: Rethinking the phenomenology of human–technology relations
Verbeek, P.-P. (2008) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-008-9099-x · Cited by 315
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2005-11-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 43-1523-43-1523
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1578529897
- Cited by
- 1,059
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What things do: philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.43-1523
- The paper
- What things do: philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. (2005). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-1523
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.