Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 362

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Other minds: how humans bridge the divide between self and others

·2006·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

Part 1. Questions About the Phenomenon. L.J. Moses, Executive Functioning and Children's Theories of Mind. B.F. Malle, Three Puzzles of Mindreading. M.H. Davis, A Constituent Approach to the Study of Perspective Taking: What Are its Fundamental Elements? D.D. Hutto, Starting Without Theory: Confronting the Paradox of Conceptual Development. Part 2. Reading Behavior, Reading Minds. D. Fernandez-Duque, J.A. Baird, Is There a Social Brain? Lessons From Eye-Gaze Following, Joint Attention, and Autism. S.R. Fussell, R.E. Kraut, D. Gergle, L.D. Setlock, Visual Cues as Evidence of Others' Minds in Collaborative Physical Tasks. G.D. Reeder, D. Trafimow, Attributing Motives to Other People. S.J. Read, L.C. Miller, Explanatory Coherence and Goal-based Knowledge Structures in Making Dispositional Inferences. Part 3. Reading One's Own Mind, Reading Other Minds. J. Decety, Perspective Taking as the Royal Avenue to Empathy. D.R. Ames, Everyday Solutions to the Problem of Other Minds: Which Tools Are Used When? J. Perner, A. Kuhberger, Mental Simulation: Royal Road to Other Minds? R.J. Bogdan, Why Self-ascriptions Are Difficult and Develop Late. Part 4. Language and Other Minds. J.W. Astington, E. Filippova, Language as the Route into Other Minds. M. Barker, T. Givon, Representation of the Interlocutor's Mind During Conversation. M.F. Schober, Conceptual Alignment in Conversation. J.S. Uleman, On the Inherent Ambiguity of Traits and Other Mental Concepts. Part 5. Limits of Mindreading. D.J. Barr, B. Keysar, Mindreading in an Exotic Case: The Normal Adult Human. L. Van Boven, G. Loewenstein, Empathy Gaps in Emotional Perspective Taking. S.D. Hodges, Is How Much You Understand Me in Your Head or Mine? W. Ickes, J.A. Simpson, M. Orina, Empathic Accuracy and Inaccuracy in Close Relationships. R. Langdon, Theory of Mind in Schizophrenia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.43-3084

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 362

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2006-01-01
Volume
43
Issue
05
Pages
43-3084-43-3084
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W1522040109
Cited by
362
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Other minds: how humans bridge the divide between self and others. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.43-3084
The paper
Other minds: how humans bridge the divide between self and others. (2006). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-3084

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.