The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Other minds: how humans bridge the divide between self and others
Abstract
Part 1. Questions About the Phenomenon. L.J. Moses, Executive Functioning and Children's Theories of Mind. B.F. Malle, Three Puzzles of Mindreading. M.H. Davis, A Constituent Approach to the Study of Perspective Taking: What Are its Fundamental Elements? D.D. Hutto, Starting Without Theory: Confronting the Paradox of Conceptual Development. Part 2. Reading Behavior, Reading Minds. D. Fernandez-Duque, J.A. Baird, Is There a Social Brain? Lessons From Eye-Gaze Following, Joint Attention, and Autism. S.R. Fussell, R.E. Kraut, D. Gergle, L.D. Setlock, Visual Cues as Evidence of Others' Minds in Collaborative Physical Tasks. G.D. Reeder, D. Trafimow, Attributing Motives to Other People. S.J. Read, L.C. Miller, Explanatory Coherence and Goal-based Knowledge Structures in Making Dispositional Inferences. Part 3. Reading One's Own Mind, Reading Other Minds. J. Decety, Perspective Taking as the Royal Avenue to Empathy. D.R. Ames, Everyday Solutions to the Problem of Other Minds: Which Tools Are Used When? J. Perner, A. Kuhberger, Mental Simulation: Royal Road to Other Minds? R.J. Bogdan, Why Self-ascriptions Are Difficult and Develop Late. Part 4. Language and Other Minds. J.W. Astington, E. Filippova, Language as the Route into Other Minds. M. Barker, T. Givon, Representation of the Interlocutor's Mind During Conversation. M.F. Schober, Conceptual Alignment in Conversation. J.S. Uleman, On the Inherent Ambiguity of Traits and Other Mental Concepts. Part 5. Limits of Mindreading. D.J. Barr, B. Keysar, Mindreading in an Exotic Case: The Normal Adult Human. L. Van Boven, G. Loewenstein, Empathy Gaps in Emotional Perspective Taking. S.D. Hodges, Is How Much You Understand Me in Your Head or Mine? W. Ickes, J.A. Simpson, M. Orina, Empathic Accuracy and Inaccuracy in Close Relationships. R. Langdon, Theory of Mind in Schizophrenia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Human empathy through the lens of social neuroscience.
Decety, J., & Lamm, C. (2006) · The Scientific World JOURNAL · doi:10.1100/tsw.2006.221 · Cited by 1,051
Jackson, P. L., Brunet, E., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2006) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.015 · Cited by 838
The power of simulation: Imagining one's own and other's behavior
Decety, J., & Grèzes, J. (2006) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.115 · Cited by 790
Shared Reality: Experiencing Commonality with others' Inner States about the World
Echterhoff, G., Higgins, E. T., & Levine, J. M. (2009) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01161.x · Cited by 677
Making sense by making sentient: Effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism.
Waytz, A., Morewedge, C. K., Epley, N., Monteleone, G., Gao, J.-H., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020240 · Cited by 587
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2006-01-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 05
- Pages
- 43-3084-43-3084
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1522040109
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Other minds: how humans bridge the divide between self and others. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.43-3084
- The paper
- Other minds: how humans bridge the divide between self and others. (2006). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-3084
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.