Cited by 1,051Action Observation and SynchronizationEmpathy and Medical EducationEmotions and Moral Behavior

Human empathy through the lens of social neuroscience.

Open access
Decety, Jean, Lamm, Claus·2006·The Scientific World JOURNAL

Abstract

Empathy is the ability to experience and understand what others feel without confusion between oneself and others. Knowing what someone else is feeling plays a fundamental role in interpersonal interactions. In this paper, we articulate evidence from social psychology and cognitive neuroscience, and argue that empathy involves both emotion sharing (bottom-up information processing) and executive control to regulate and modulate this experience (top-down information processing), underpinned by specific and interacting neural systems. Furthermore, awareness of a distinction between the experiences of the self and others constitutes a crucial aspect of empathy. We discuss data from recent behavioral and functional neuroimaging studies with an emphasis on the perception of pain in others, and highlight the role of different neural mechanisms that underpin the experience of empathy, including emotion sharing, perspective taking, and emotion regulation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1100/tsw.2006.221

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intact ability to distinguish between the self and other allows the observer to attribute the emotional state to the observed individual, thereby reducing personal distress and giving rise to empathic concern.

    “Intact ability to distinguish between the self and other then allows the observer to attribute the emotional state to the observed individual, thereby reducing personal distress, and giving rise to empathic concern (Bird and Viding, 2014; Coll, Viding, et al., 2017; Davis, 1980; Decety and Lamm, 2006; Moriguchi et al., 2007b).”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Decety and Lamm, 2006

  • Witnessing pain in others activates a similar network as the first-hand experience of pain.

    “A growing number of neuroimaging studies reliably documents that witnessing pain in others activates a similar network as the first-hand experience of pain [12], [34 for reviews].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 100 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Ickes, W. (1997) Empathic Accuracy. The Guilford Press, New York.
  2. Batson, C.D. (2006) Folly bridges. In Bridging Social Psychology. van Lange, P.A.M., Ed. Erlbaum, Mahwah. pp. 59-64.
  3. Russell, J. (1996) Agency and Its Role in Mental Development. Psychology Press, Hove.
  4. Ickes, W., Ed. The Guilford Press, New York. pp. 144-168.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Decety, J., & Lamm, C.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology Center for Cognitive and Social Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
  • University of Chicago (US)
Venue
The Scientific World JOURNAL
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006
Volume
6
Pages
1146-1163
ISSN
1537-744X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144872492
Cited by
1,051
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 82 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 44
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Scientific World JOURNAL (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
empathy, social neuroscience, emotional sharing, executive function, top-down processing, bottom-up processing, self-other distinction, perspective taking, emotion regulation, neural mechanisms of empathy
MeSH terms
Awareness, Brain Mapping, Empathy, Biological Evolution, Humans, Models, Psychological, Nerve Net, Neurosciences, Psychology, Social, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review