The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polarized America: the dance of ideology and unequal riches
Abstract
This chapter documents that this surge has continued through 2004.Our data confirm the more casual observation of polarization in the conflict over aid to the contras in Nicaragua, the confirmation hearings and votes after the nominations of Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court, the rhetoric of the "Contract with America", the budget showdown between Speaker Gingrich and President Clinton in 1995, and the impeachment process in 1998-99. Measuring Ideology and Polarization: A Quick PrimerHow do we know that polarization has occurred?Every aficionado of American politics would label Ted Kennedy (D-MA) and Paul Wellstone (D-WI) as liberals, Sam Nunn (D-GA) and Jacob Javits (R-NY) as moderates, and Tom Delay (R-TX) and Jesse Helms (R-NC) as conservatives.But how does one discern that Jesse Helms is more conservative than Rick Santorum?And how do we know that Santorum is more conservative than Heinz since, obviously, the two men never served in Congress together?How do we locate Wellstone relative to someone even more remote, say William Jennings Bryan who denounced Republicans for crucifying mankind on a "cross of gold"?Most political scientists traditionally have measured liberal-conservative positions by using the data provided by the interest group ratings of the Americans for Democratic Action, the League of Conservation Voters, or the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.Groups construct these ratings by choosing the roll call votes that are important to their legislative agendas and identify whether a yea or nay vote indicates support for the group's goals.Indices are then constructed from the proportion of votes a member cast in
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Rational Theory of the Size of Government
Meltzer, A. H., & Richard, S. F. (1981) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261013 · Cited by 5,485
Cited by
The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States
Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034 · Cited by 3,603
Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfs038 · Cited by 2,996
Political Polarization in the American Public
Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2008) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.153836 · Cited by 1,881
Ali, S., Abuhmed, T., El-Sappagh, S., Muhammad, K., Alonso-Moral, J. M., Confalonieri, R., Guidotti, R., Del Ser, J., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., & Herrera, F. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805 · Cited by 1,762
Media and Political Polarization
Prior, M. (2013) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242 · Cited by 1,125
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2007-02-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 06
- Pages
- 44-3551-44-3551
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1559198035
- Cited by
- 1,795
- References
- 1
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Polarized America: the dance of ideology and unequal riches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.44-3551
- The paper
- Polarized America: the dance of ideology and unequal riches. (2007). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.44-3551
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.