The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fans, bloggers, and gamers: exploring participatory culture
Abstract
"Henry Jenkins's pioneering work in the early 1990s promoted the idea that fans are among the most active, creative, critically engaged, and socially connected consumers of popular culture and that they represent the vanguard of a new relationship with mass media. Though marginal and largely invisible to the general public at the time, today, media producers and advertisers, not to mention researchers and fans, take for granted the idea that the success of a media franchise depends on fan investments and participation. Bringing together the highlights of a decade and a half of groundbreaking research into the cultural life of media consumers, Fans, Bloggers, and Gamers takes readers from Jenkins's progressive early work defending fan culture against those who would marginalize or stigmatize it, through to his more recent work, combating moral panic and defending Goths and gamers in the wake of the Columbine shootings. Starting with an interview on the current state of fan studies, this volume maps the core theoretical and methodological issues in Fan Studies. It goes on to chart the growth of participatory culture on the web, take up blogging as perhaps the most powerful illustration of how consumer participation impacts mainstream media, and debate the public policy implications surrounding participation and intellectual property." http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0730/2006008890-d.html.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2009) · International journal of communication · Cited by 569
The mediatisation of religion: Theorising religion, media and social change
Hjarvard, S. (2011) · Culture and Religion · doi:10.1080/14755610.2011.579719 · Cited by 319
Chen, Z. T. (2021) · Journal of Consumer Culture · doi:10.1177/1469540518787574 · Cited by 121
Digital Seriality: On the Serial Aesthetics and Practice of Digital Games
Denson, S., & Jahn-Sudmann, A. (2013) · Eludamos: Journal for Computer Game Culture · doi:10.7557/23.6145 · Cited by 61
Does recreational computer use affect high school achievement?
Bowers, A. J., & Berland, M. (2013) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-012-9274-1 · Cited by 40
Grusauskaite, K., Carbone, L., Harambam, J., & Aupers, S. (2024) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448231162585 · Cited by 37
We Tried to Tell Y'All: Black Twitter and the Rise of Digital Counternarratives
Clark, M. D. (2025) · Oxford University Press · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190068141.001.0001 · Cited by 27
Li, E. C.-Y., & Pang, K.-W. (2024) · European Journal of Cultural Studies · doi:10.1177/13675494241236146 · Cited by 24
Social media, design and creative citizenship: an introduction
Mainsah, H. N. (2017) · Digital Creativity · doi:10.1080/14626268.2017.1306568 · Cited by 16
Hvenegaard Rasmussen, C., Rydbeck, K., & Larsen, H. (2022) · doi:10.4324/9781003188834 · Cited by 8
We Wish to Tweet Our Own Cause—Theorizing Black Twitter
Clark, M. D. (2025) · We Tried to Tell Y'All · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190068141.003.0002
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2007-04-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 08
- Pages
- 44-4296-44-4296
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W237271557
- Cited by
- 1,720
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.