The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Brewing justice: fair trade coffee, sustainability, and survival
Abstract
List of Figures List of Tables Preface Introduction 1. A Movement or a Market? 2. Coffee, Commodities, Crisis 3. One Region, Two Markets 4. The Difference a Market Makes: Livelihoods and Labor 5. A Sustainable Cup? Fair Trade, Shade-Grown Coffee, and Organic Production 6. Eating and Staying on the Land: Food Security and Migration 7. Dancing with the Devil? 8. Mejor, Pero No Muy Bien Que Digamos: The Limits of Fair Trade 9. Strengthening Fair Trade Conclusion Acknowledgments Appendix: Research Methods Notes Bibliography Index
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Impact of Fair Trade Certification for Coffee Farmers in Peru
Ruben, R., & Fort, R. (2012) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.07.030 · Cited by 305
Weak Coffee: Certification and Co-Optation in the Fair Trade Movement
(2012) · Social Problems · doi:10.1525/sp.2012.59.1.94 · Cited by 188
Ofstehage, A. (2012) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-012-9371-0 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2007-11-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 45-1571-45-1571
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W1599369958
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brewing justice: fair trade coffee, sustainability, and survival. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.45-1571
- The paper
- Brewing justice: fair trade coffee, sustainability, and survival. (2007). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.45-1571
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
