Cited by 125Indian and Buddhist StudiesStudy and Philosophy of ReligionReligious Studies and Spiritual Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The making of Buddhist modernism

·2009·Choice Reviews Online

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.46-4973

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The case of Zen faith is one example of the attempt to purge Buddhism of any 'religious' attribute, which is a major trend in Buddhist modernism.

    “In order words, the case of Zen faith is but one example of the attempt to purge Buddhism from any 'religious' attribute, which is one of the major trends in Buddhist modernism (McMahan 2008, 5).”

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2009-05-01
Volume
46
Issue
09
Pages
46-4973-46-4973
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W250482587
Cited by
125
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 20 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
Keywords
Buddhist modernism, Buddhism, religious modernization, Buddhist reform, religious history

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review