The Common Pot: The Recovery of Native Space in the Northeast
Abstract
Literary critics frequently portray early Native American writers either as individuals caught between two worlds or as subjects who, even as they defied the colonial world, struggled to exist within it. In striking counterpoint to these analyses, Lisa Brooks demonstrates the ways in which Native leaders-including Samson Occom, Joseph Brant, Hendrick Aupaumut, and William Apess-adopted writing as a tool to reclaim rights and land in the Native networks of what is now the northeastern United States. The Common Pot, a metaphor that appears in Native writings during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, embodies land, community, and the shared space of sustenance among relations. Far from being corrupted by forms of writing introduced by European colonizers, Brooks contends, Native people frequently rejected the roles intended for them by their missionary teachers and used the skills they acquired to compose petitions, political tracts, and speeches; to record community councils and histories; and most important, to imagine collectively the routes through which the Common Pot could survive. Reframing the historical landscape of the region, Brooks constructs a provocative new picture of Native space before and after colonization. By recovering and reexamining Algonquian and Iroquoian texts, she shows that writing was not a foreign technology but rather a crucial weapon in the Native Americans' arsenal as they resisted-and today continue to oppose-colonial domination.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Delormier, T., Horn‐Miller, K., McComber, A. M., & Marquis, K. (2017) · Maternal & Child Nutrition · doi:10.1111/mcn.12556 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Building Healthy Community Relationships Through Food Security and Food Sovereignty
Delormier, T., & Marquis, K. (2019) · Current Developments in Nutrition · doi:10.1093/cdn/nzy088 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
An ethos of responsibility and indigenous women water protectors in the #NoDAPL movement.
Privott, M. (2019) · The American Indian Quarterly · doi:10.5250/amerindiquar.43.1.0074 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Ethnographic Refusal: Anthropological Need
(2014) · Mohawk Interruptus · doi:10.1215/9780822376781-004 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Indigenous Interruptions: Mohawk Nationhood, Citizenship, and the State
(2014) · Mohawk Interruptus · doi:10.1215/9780822376781-001
Whose Native Place? The Dickinsons and the Colonization of the Connecticut River Valley
Brooks, L. (2022) · The Oxford Handbook of Emily Dickinson · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198833932.013.31
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2009-10-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 47-1035-47-1035
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W657507821
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 40
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › American Literature and Culture
- Keywords
- Native American literature, native space, petitions, political tracts, speech, community councils, Samson Occom, Joseph Brant, William Apess, colonial resistance, northeastern United States, 18th century, 19th century
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review