Cited by 0Indigenous Cultures and HistoryColonialism, slavery, and tradeLiterature: history, themes, analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Whose Native Place? The Dickinsons and the Colonization of the Connecticut River Valley

Brooks, Lisa·2022·The Oxford Handbook of Emily Dickinson

Abstract

Before there was Amherst, there was Nonotuck. When Emily’s ancestor, Nathaniel Dickinson, and a group of withdrawers from the churches at Hartford and Wethersfield sought to settle a plantation on the Connecticut River, they knew they were requesting land in Nonotuck, one of many Indigenous homelands on Kwinitekw, the long river. This essay highlights the prominent role of the Dickinson family in the story of the colonization of the Connecticut River Valley, focusing especially on deeds, negotiations, warfare, and captivity. It also locates Emily Dickinson’s ancestors and the Connecticut River Valley within the larger networks of Native space. The essay focuses on the period 1650–1759, including the Anglo-Abenaki wars and the settlement of Amherst, but touches on nineteenth-century Amherst, as well.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198833932.013.31

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. 2006, Descendants of Nathaniel Dickinson
  2. 1896, Soldiers in King Philip’s War
  3. Bruchac, Margaret M. “Revisiting Pocumtuck History in Deerfield: George Sheldon’s Vanishing Indian Act.” Historical Journal of Massachusetts, no. 1–2 (June 2011): 30–77.
  4. An Agawam Fragment., International Journal of American Linguistics
  5. 2003, Captors and Captives: The 1704 Raid on Deerfield
  6. 1859, Papers Concerning the Attack on Hatfield and Deerfield by a Party of Indians from Canada, September Nineteenth, 1677
  7. 1863, History of Hadley
  8. Map to African-American Historic Sites., American Centuries.
  9. Nash, Alice. “Quanquan’s Mortgage of 1663.” In Cultivating a Past: Essays on the History of Hadley, Massachusetts, edited by Marla R. Miller, 25–42. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2009.
  10. 1982, The d.
  11. Raid on Deerfield: The Many Stories of 1704
  12. 1884, Reunion of the Dickinson Family, Amherst, Mass
  13. Letter to John Allyn giving notice of the release of Mrs. Rowlandson.
  14. 1895, A History of Deerfield, Massachusetts.
  15. 2018, Devil’s Den to Lickingwater: The Mill River through Landscape and History
  16. ‘As if in a Great Darkness’: Native American Refugees of the Middle Connecticut River Valley in the Aftermath of King Philip’s War., Historical Journal of Massachusetts
  17. 1872, History of the Town of Whately, Massachusetts
  18. 1875, A History of the Town of Northfield, Massachusetts
  19. History.
  20. 1898, History of Northampton from Its Settlement in 1654
  21. 1910, A History of Hatfield Massachusetts in Three Parts
  22. Lucy Terry Prince., Black Past.org.
  23. 1905, Indian Deeds of Hampden County.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Brooks, L.
Affiliations
Amherst College (US)
Corresponding author
Brooks, Lisa
Venue
The Oxford Handbook of Emily Dickinson
Published
2022-05-19
Pages
17-35
OpenAlex
W4281476606
Cited by
0
References
19
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literature: history, themes, analysis
Keywords
Emily Dickinson, Connecticut Valley, colonization, indigenous territories, native space, Amherst, land negotiation, family history

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review