Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,236

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Health at a glance: OECD indicators

·2010·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

Unplanned downtime in industries poses significant challenges, affecting production efficiency and profitability. To address this issue, companies strive to optimize operations and minimize disruptions that hinder meeting customer demands and financial targets. Predictive maintenance, utilizing advanced technologies such as data analytics, machine learning, and IoT devices, enables real-time monitoring and analysis of equipment data. This study focuses on training an adaptable machine-learning model for predicting faults in induction motors in industrial settings. By implementing such a model, proactive maintenance can be facilitated, leading to reduced downtime in industrial operations. A dataset containing healthy and faulty conditions of four 3 phase induction motors, along with relevant features for fault prediction, was obtained. Multiple machine learning algorithms were trained using this dataset, and they demonstrated promising performance. The RF model achieved the highest accuracy of 0.91, followed by the Ann and k-NN models with an accuracy of 0.9. The DT model achieved the lowest accuracy of 0.89. Further evaluation of the models was conducted using a confusion matrix, which provided a detailed breakdown of the model's performance for each class, indicating the number of correctly and incorrectly classified induction motor conditions. The outcome of the confusion matrix demonstrated that the models successfully classified the different states or conditions of the induction motors. To enhance the performance of the models, future work should involve refining the ANN and RF models, exploring transfer learning or ensemble methods, and incorporating diverse datasets to improve generalization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.47-4774

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 73 references

Cited by

See all 1,236

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2010-05-01
Volume
47
Issue
09
Pages
47-4774-47-4774
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W4232575633
Cited by
1,236
References
73
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Health at a glance: OECD indicators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.47-4774
The paper
Health at a glance: OECD indicators. (2010). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.47-4774

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.