Cited by 277Education Methods and PracticesEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentChild Development and Education

Free to Learn: Why Unleashing the Instinct to Play Will Make Our Children Happier, More Self-Reliant, and Better Students for Life

·2013·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

Our children spend their days being passively instructed, and made to sit still and take tests--often against their will. We call this imprisonment schooling, yet wonder why kids become bored and misbehave. Even outside of school children today seldom play and explore without adult supervision, and are afforded few opportunities to control their own lives. The result: anxious, unfocused children who see schooling--and life--as a series of hoops to struggle through. In Free to Learn, developmental psychologist Peter Gray argues that our children, if free to pursue their own interests through play, will not only learn all they need to know, but will do so with energy and passion. Children come into this world burning to learn, equipped with the curiosity, playfulness, and sociability to direct their own education. Yet we have squelched such instincts in a school model originally developed to indoctrinate, not to promote intellectual growth. To foster children who will thrive in today's constantly changing world, we must entrust them to steer their own learning and development. Drawing on evidence from anthropology, psychology, and history, Gray demonstrates that free play is the primary means by which children learn to control their lives, solve problems, get along with peers, and become emotionally resilient. This capacity to learn through play evolved long ago, in hunter-gatherer bands where children acquired the skills of the culture through their own initiatives. And these instincts still operate remarkably well today, as studies at alternative, democratically administered schools show. When children are in charge of their own education, they learn better--and at lower cost than the traditional model of coercive schooling. A brave, counterintuitive proposal for freeing our children from the shackles of the curiosity-killing institution we call school, Free to Learn suggests that it's time to stop asking what's wrong with our children, and start asking what's wrong with the system. It shows how we can act--both as parents and as members of society--to improve children's lives and promote their happiness and learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.50-6461

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2013-07-01
Volume
50
Issue
11
Pages
50-6461-50-6461
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W576126742
Cited by
277
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 23 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Choice Reviews Online (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0905606)
  • National Evolutionary Synthesis Center (EF0905606, 0905606)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Methods and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Education
Keywords
free play, childhood, school education, self-directed learning, child autonomy, curiosity, alternative schools, democratic school, psychological resilience, child development, educational reform

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review