Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 630

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Simulation and similarity: using models to understand the world

·2013·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

Contents Preface 1 Introduction 1.1 Two Aquatic Puzzles 1.2 Models of Modeling 2 Three Kinds of Models 2.1 Concrete Model: The San Francisco Bay-Delta Model 2.2 Mathematical Model: Lotka-Volterra Model 2.3 Computational Model: Schelling's Segregation Model 2.4 Common Features of these Models 2.5 Only Three Types of Models? 2.6 Fewer Than Three Types of Model? 3 The Anatomy of Models: Structure & Construal 3.1 Structure 3.1.1 Concrete Structures 3.1.2 Mathematical 3.1.3 Computational 3.2 Model Descriptions 3.3 Construal 3.4 Representational Capacity of Structures 4 Fictions and Folk Ontology 4.1 Against Maths: Individuation, Causes, and Face Value Practice 4.2 A Simple Fictions Account 4.3 Enriching the Simple Account 4.3.1 Waltonian Fictionalism 4.3.2 Fictions without Models 4.4 Why I am not a Fictionalist 4.4.1 Variation 4.4.2 Representational Capacity of Different Models 4.4.3 Making Sense of Modeling 4.4.4 Variation in Practice 4.5 Folk ontology 4.6 Maths, Interpretation, and Folk Ontology 5 Target Directed Modeling 5.1 Model Development 5.2 Analysis of the Model 5.2.1 Complete Analysis 5.2.2 Goal-directed Analysis 5.3 Model/Target Comparison 5.3.1 Phenomena and Target Systems 5.3.2 Establishing the fit between Model and Target 5.3.3 Representations of Targets 6 Idealization 6.1 Three Kinds of Idealization 6.1.1 Galilean idealization 6.1.2 Minimalist idealization 6.1.3 Multiple Models Idealization 6.2 Representational Ideals and Fidelity Criteria 6.2.1 Completeness 6.2.2 Simplicity 6.2.3 1-Causal 6.2.4 Maxout 6.2.5 P-General 6.3 Idealization and Representational Ideals 6.4 Idealization and Target Directed Modeling 7 Modeling Without a Specific Target 7.1 Generalized Modeling 7.1.1 How Possibly Explanations 7.1.2 Minimal Models and First Order Causal Structures 7.2 Hypothetical Modeling 7.2.1 Contingent Non-existence: xDNA 7.2.2 Impossible Targets: Infinite Population Growth and Perpetual Motion 7.3 Targetless Modeling 7.4 A Moving Target: The Case of Three-sex Biology 8 An Account of Similarity 8.1 Desiderata for Model/World Relations 8.2 Model Theoretic Accounts 8.3 Similarity 8.4 Tversky's Contrast Account 8.5 Attributes and Mechanisms 8.6 Feature Sets, Construals, and Target Systems 8.7 Modeling Goals and Weighting Parameters 8.8 Weighting Function and Background Theory 8.9 Satisfying the Desiderata 9 Robustness Analysis and Idealization 9.1 Levins and Wimsatt on Robustness 9.2 Finding Robust Theorems 9.3 Three Kinds of Robustness 9.3.1 Parameter Robustness 9.3.2 Structural Robustness 9.3.3 Representational Robustness 9.4 Robustness and Confirmation 10 Conclusion: The Practice of Modeling References

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.51-0251

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2013-08-20
Volume
51
Issue
01
Pages
51-0251-51-0251
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W380289026
Cited by
630
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.