CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 61Academic integrity and plagiarismPsychometric Methodologies and TestingEthics in Business and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Construction of academic integrity scale

Open access
Ramdani, Zulmi·2018·International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology
DOI 10.5861/ijrsp.2018.3003
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This study aims to create a measure of academic integrity as an effort in anticipating the problems of plagiarism and other academic violations.The concept of academic integrity comes from Keohane (1999) which is defined as an individual's commitment to positive values so as to be able to act and behave accordingly in creating a good academic situation.This research uses semi-construction approach which is divided into several stages.( 1) Open ended-questionnaire; (2) Content Validity Aiken's; (3) Testing of discriminating power; (4) Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) & (5) Validity of Concurrent.There were 7 items dropped during content validation stage (rater = 25, v = 0.63 & p> 0.05).After that, testing of discrimination power with the number of subjects 60 people was administered and it resulted 11 items dropped (r = 0.3).A total of 32 items were analyzed CFA (n = 254) with KMO-Bartlett's Test result of (0.921) and significance (0.001), and it resulted 17 items corresponding to each construct.The score of reliability scale (r = 0.866).While for external validity test of academic integrity correlated with optimism (n = 194, r = 0.694).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5861/ijrsp.2018.3003

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Azwar, S. (2016). Test construction of cognitive abilities [Konstruksi tes kemampuan kognitif]. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
  2. Chizanah, L., & Hadjam, M. N. R. (2011). Construct validity of sincere : Exploratory factor analysisi of sincere scale [Validitas konstruk ikhlas : Analisis faktor eksploratori terhadap instrumen skala ikhlas]. Jurnal Psikologi, 38(2), 199–214.
  3. Curtin University. (2015). Academic integrity, student guidelines for avoiding plagiarism. Perth, Australia.
  4. Firmantyo, T., & Alsa, A. (2016). Academic integrity and academic anxiety in facing national exam on students [Integritas akademik dan kecemasan akademik dalam menghadapi ujian nasional pada siswa]. PSIKOHUMANIORA: Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 1(1), 1–11.
  5. Jahja, A. S. (2007). Academic integrity in building professional human resources in college: Case academic dishonesty STIE Perbanas [Integritas akademik dalam membangun sumber daya manusia profesional di perguruan tinggi: Kasus academic dishonesty STIE Perbanas]. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 14(1), 46–61.
  6. Kemendikbud RI. (2003). Law of the Republic of Indonesia number 20 of 2003 on national education system [Undang-undang Republik Indonesia nomor 20 tahun 2003 tentang sistem pendidikan nasional]. Jakarta.
  7. Wahyono, T. (2004). The role of optimism, self-efficacy in change and the perceived support of the organization towards employees' commitment to organizational change in production employees [Peran optimisme, efikasi diri dalam perubahan dan dukungan yang dirasakan dari organisasi terhadap komitmen karyawan tentang perubahan organisasi pada karyawan bagian produksi]. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ramdani, Z.
Affiliations
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Corresponding author
Ramdani, Zulmi
ORCID
Ramdani, Zulmi
Venue
International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology
Publisher
Consortia Academia Publishing
Published
2018-03-21
Volume
7
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 2243-7681 (ISSN-L)
  • 2243-769X
DOI
10.5861/ijrsp.2018.3003
OpenAlex
W2790607490
Cited by
61
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
12.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Curtin University of Technology
  • Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
Keywords
academic integrity, scale development, plagiarism, academic misconduct, content validity, item discrimination, confirmatory factor analysis, optimism, scale reliability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review