The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Construction of academic integrity scale
Open accessAbstract
This study aims to create a measure of academic integrity as an effort in anticipating the problems of plagiarism and other academic violations.The concept of academic integrity comes from Keohane (1999) which is defined as an individual's commitment to positive values so as to be able to act and behave accordingly in creating a good academic situation.This research uses semi-construction approach which is divided into several stages.( 1) Open ended-questionnaire; (2) Content Validity Aiken's; (3) Testing of discriminating power; (4) Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) & (5) Validity of Concurrent.There were 7 items dropped during content validation stage (rater = 25, v = 0.63 & p> 0.05).After that, testing of discrimination power with the number of subjects 60 people was administered and it resulted 11 items dropped (r = 0.3).A total of 32 items were analyzed CFA (n = 254) with KMO-Bartlett's Test result of (0.921) and significance (0.001), and it resulted 17 items corresponding to each construct.The score of reliability scale (r = 0.866).While for external validity test of academic integrity correlated with optimism (n = 194, r = 0.694).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Although existing studies examine AI adoption and traditional academic misconduct, they offer limited empirical insight into how students conceptualize ethical responsibility when using generative AI tools.”
From Academic Integrity and Students’ Ethical Use of ChatGPT in Higher Education (2026) · cites this paper as Ramdani, 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, theoretical discussions often lack practical, evidence-based strategies to guide the ethical use of AI in educational contexts (Guerrero-Dib et al., 2020;Ramdani, 2018;Zawacki-Richter et al., 2019).”
From Academic Integrity and Students’ Ethical Use of ChatGPT in Higher Education (2026) · cites this paper as Ramdani, 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014 · Cited by 14,542
Three Coefficients for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Ratings
Aiken, L. R. (1985) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164485451012 · Cited by 1,355
Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1987) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1987.tb00434.x · Cited by 1,268
Scale Construction: Developing Reliable and Valid Measurement Instruments
Hinkin, T. R., Tracey, J. B., & Enz, C. A. (1997) · Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research · doi:10.1177/109634809702100108 · Cited by 836
Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs
Boyle, G. J., Saklofske, D. H., & MATTHEWS, G. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2010-0-68427-6 · Cited by 430
Craig, S. B., & Gustafson, S. B. (1998) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(98)90001-7 · Cited by 286
Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Shultz, K. S., & Whitney, D. J. (2005) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781452224749.n18 · Cited by 270
Character strengths and virtues
Hart, R. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315147857-10 · Cited by 256
Kisamore, J. L., Stone, T. H., & Jawahar, I. M. “. (2007) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9260-9 · Cited by 222
Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis
Babones, S. (2015) · Sage eBooks · Cited by 202
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Azwar, S. (2016). Test construction of cognitive abilities [Konstruksi tes kemampuan kognitif]. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
- Chizanah, L., & Hadjam, M. N. R. (2011). Construct validity of sincere : Exploratory factor analysisi of sincere scale [Validitas konstruk ikhlas : Analisis faktor eksploratori terhadap instrumen skala ikhlas]. Jurnal Psikologi, 38(2), 199–214.
- Curtin University. (2015). Academic integrity, student guidelines for avoiding plagiarism. Perth, Australia.
- Firmantyo, T., & Alsa, A. (2016). Academic integrity and academic anxiety in facing national exam on students [Integritas akademik dan kecemasan akademik dalam menghadapi ujian nasional pada siswa]. PSIKOHUMANIORA: Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 1(1), 1–11.
- Jahja, A. S. (2007). Academic integrity in building professional human resources in college: Case academic dishonesty STIE Perbanas [Integritas akademik dalam membangun sumber daya manusia profesional di perguruan tinggi: Kasus academic dishonesty STIE Perbanas]. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 14(1), 46–61.
- Kemendikbud RI. (2003). Law of the Republic of Indonesia number 20 of 2003 on national education system [Undang-undang Republik Indonesia nomor 20 tahun 2003 tentang sistem pendidikan nasional]. Jakarta.
- Wahyono, T. (2004). The role of optimism, self-efficacy in change and the perceived support of the organization towards employees' commitment to organizational change in production employees [Peran optimisme, efikasi diri dalam perubahan dan dukungan yang dirasakan dari organisasi terhadap komitmen karyawan tentang perubahan organisasi pada karyawan bagian produksi]. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Use of ChatGPT in academia: Academic integrity hangs in the balance
Bin-Nashwan, S. A., Sadallah, M., & Bouteraa, M. (2023) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102370 · Cited by 394
Bouteraa, M., Bin‐Nashwan, S. A., Al-Daihani, M., Dirie, K. A., Benlahcene, A., Sadallah, M., Zaki, H. O., Lada, S., Ansar, R., Fook, L. M., et al. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100402 · Cited by 222
Reyneke, Y., Shuttleworth, C. C., & Visagie, R. (2021) · Accounting Education · doi:10.1080/09639284.2020.1867875 · Cited by 36
Ramdani, Z., Marliani, R., & Rahman, A. A. (2019) · Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews · doi:10.18510/hssr.2019.7545 · Cited by 30
Self-citationChatGPT: a transformative role in academia–insights into academic staff performance since adoption
Sadallah, M., Bin‐Nashwan, S. A., & Benlahcene, A. (2024) · Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society · doi:10.1108/jices-07-2024-0097 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramdani, Z.
- Affiliations
- Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
- Corresponding author
- Ramdani, Zulmi
- ORCID
- Ramdani, Zulmi
- Venue
- International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology
- Publisher
- Consortia Academia Publishing
- Published
- 2018-03-21
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2243-7681 (ISSN-L)
- 2243-769X
- OpenAlex
- W2790607490
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 12.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
- Curtin University of Technology
- Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Keywords
- academic integrity, scale development, plagiarism, academic misconduct, content validity, item discrimination, confirmatory factor analysis, optimism, scale reliability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
