Cited by 264Writing and Handwriting EducationLinguistics and Education ResearchEducation Pedagogy and Practices

EJ Extra: A Snapshot of Writing Instruction in Middle Schools and High Schools [FREE ACCESS]

Applebee, Arthur N., Langer, Judith A.·2011·English Journal

Abstract

In the May 2009 issue of English Journal , we reported on our analysis of data from the National Assessment of Educational Progress to provide a first look at changes in the teaching of writing over the past 30 years. In this article, we provide a more detailed look, drawing on data collected from visits to 260 English, math, social studies, and science classrooms in 20 middle schools and high schools in five states (schools all chosen for reputations for excellence in the teaching of writing), interviews with 220 teachers and administrators, and with 138 students in these schools, and a national survey of 1520 randomly selected teachers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.58680/ej201116413

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Humanities teachers' reservation to use AI seems to reflect the belief that it will hurt students in developing analytical and interpretative skills, especially in areas requiring originality, subtlety, and personal involvement with text, as shown through short responses in overreliance and plagiarism.

    “Humanities teachers' reservation to use the AI tool seems to reflect from the belief that this will eventually hurt students in developing the necessary analytical and interpretative skills, especially in those areas that require originality, subtlety, and personal involvement with the text, as shown through their short responses in over reliance and plagiarism (Applebee & Langer, 2011).”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Applebee, A. N., & Langer, J. A.
Venue
English Journal
Published
2011-07-01
Volume
100
Issue
6
Pages
14-27
ISSN
  • 0013-8274 (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-8895
OpenAlex
W4392435448
Cited by
264
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 3
FWCI
49.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The English Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Linguistics and Education Research
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Pedagogy and Practices
Keywords
writing instruction, junior high school, high schools, writing teachers, writing curriculum, National Assessment of Educational Progress, writing assessment, teacher perceptions, student perceptions, classroom observation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review