The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Negotiating Translingual Literacy: An Enactment
Abstract
This article argues that an understanding of writing as translingual requires a shift to a different orientation to literacy—i.e., from autonomous and situated to negotiated. Such an orientationtreats the text as co-constructed in time and space—with parity for readers and writers in shaping the meaning and form—and thus performed rather than preconstructed, making the multimodal and multisensory dimensions of the text fully functional. Going beyond the native/nonnative and monolingual/multilingual speaker binaries, this study demonstrates that both student groups can orient themselves to such literate practices in the context of suitable pedagogical affordances. Drawing from teacher research informed by an ethnographic perspective, the study identifies four types of negotiation strategies adopted by writers to code-mesh and readers to interpret texts: envoicing, recontextualization, interaction, and entextualization. Envoicing strategies set the conditions for negotiation, as it is a consideration of voice that motivates writers to decide the extent and nature of code-meshing; recontextualization strategies prepare the ground for negotiation; interactional strategies are adopted to co-construct meaning; and entextualization strategies reveal the temporal and spatial shaping of the text to facilitate and respond to these negotiations. The analysis points to the value of a dialogical pedagogy that can further develop the negotiation strategies students already bring to the classroom.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.
Bloch, M., Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1994) · Man · doi:10.2307/2804509 · Cited by 39,454
Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.
Ellis, C., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074814 · Cited by 29,249
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-4888 · Cited by 9,294
(1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,320
Pennycook, A. (2010) · doi:10.4324/9780203846223 · Cited by 1,856
(2005) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203979402 · Cited by 1,749
On Discourse, Communication, and (Some) Fundamental Concepts in SLA Research
FIRTH, A., & WAGNER, J. (1997) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05480.x · Cited by 1,706
Translingual Practice: Global Englishes and Cosmopolitan Relations
Canagarajah, S. (2012) · Cited by 1,384
Paton, A. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7013.1154 · Cited by 1,292
Chang, H. (2016) · doi:10.4324/9781315433370 · Cited by 1,169
Cited by
Introduction: Identity, Transdisciplinarity, and the Good Language Teacher
De Costa, P. I., & Norton, B. (2017) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/modl.12368 · Cited by 426
Flores, N. (2020) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405841.2019.1665411 · Cited by 320
Rivera, A. J., & Mazak, C. M. (2017) · HOW · doi:10.19183/how.24.1.312 · Cited by 64
Barbosa, M. R. (2020) · Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada · doi:10.1590/1984-6398202016837 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Canagarajah, A. S.
- Venue
- Research in the Teaching of English
- Published
- 2013-08-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40-67
- ISSN
- 0034-527X (ISSN-L)
- 1943-2348
- OpenAlex
- W2939222057
- Cited by
- 384
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 37.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Negotiating Translingual Literacy: An Enactment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.58680/rte201324158
- The paper
- Canagarajah, A. S. (2013). Negotiating Translingual Literacy: An Enactment. Research in the Teaching of English. https://doi.org/10.58680/rte201324158
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.