Cited by 34Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Evaluation of a Digital Diabetes Prevention Program Adapted for Low-Income Patients, 2016–2018

Open access
Kim, Sue E., Castro Sweet, Cynthia M., Cho, Edward, Tsai, Jennifer, Cousineau, Michael R.·2019·Preventing Chronic Disease

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We examined the effects of a digitally delivered, type 2 diabetes mellitus prevention program (DPP) for a low-income population. METHODS: We conducted a nonrandomized clinical trial with matched controls. The intervention group was offered a digital DPP, a web-based and mobile-based program including 52 weeks of participation in an educational curriculum, health coaching, and peer support. RESULTS: . For the intervention group, mean weight loss was 4.4% at the 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: The modified DPP successfully engaged participants and resulted in weight loss. Low-income patients with prediabetes benefitted from a digitally delivered diabetes intervention. This prevention method should be accessible to a low-income population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5888/pcd16.190156

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A clinical trial ran concurrently to PREDICTS and tested the same d-DPP among a low-income, bilingual, ethnically diverse sample and documented significant engagement and improvements in body weight.

    “However, a clinical trial ran concurrently to PREDICTS and tested the same d-DPP among a low-income, bilingual, ethnically diverse sample and documented significant engagement and improvements in body weight.23”

    From Effects of a Digital Diabetes Prevention Program: An RCT (2022) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Methods describe a nonrandomized clinical trial of a digital DPP adapted for low-income patients, including Spanish translation and bilingual coaches. The Results report an ethnically diverse sample with English and Spanish language preferences, engagement measured by lesson completion, and significant weight loss at both follow-ups (P < .001). Our copy does not identify PREDICTS, so it cannot establish that this trial ran concurrently with PREDICTS or tested the same program. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The high cost of programs that require coaching limits their reach.

    “the high cost of such programs that require coaching limits their reach13,14”

    From Impact of digital health interventions on glycemic control and weight management. (2025) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Introduction describes participation barriers for in-person diabetes prevention programs, including scheduling, transportation, and childcare. The Methods describe a digital program with health coaches, but neither passage says that coaching makes programs expensive or that its cost limits their reach; searches for coaching costs and scalability found no such statement. The indexed passages have no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, S. E., Castro Sweet, C. M., Cho, E., Tsai, J., & Cousineau, M. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Omada Health, Incorporated, San Francisco, California
Corresponding author
Kim, Sue E.
Venue
Preventing Chronic Disease
Published
2019-11-27
Volume
16
Pages
E155-E155
ISSN
1545-1151 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2991470385
Cited by
34
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Preventing Chronic Disease (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • California Health Care Foundation
  • Kresge Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
type 2 diabetes prevention, digital health interventions, low-income patients, prediabetes, weight loss, health coaching, peer support, web-based program, mobile health, course program, health care access
MeSH terms
Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Poverty, Case-Control Studies, Weight Reduction Programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review