Antiracism in Action: Development and Outcomes of a Mentorship Program for Premedical Students Who Are Underrepresented or Historically Excluded in Medicine
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Black, Latinx, and Native American and Alaska Native people are underrepresented in medicine. The increasingly competitive medical school application process poses challenges for students who are underrepresented in medicine or historically excluded from medicine (UIM/HEM). The University of California, San Francisco-University of California, Berkeley (UCSF-UCB) White Coats for Black Lives Mentorship Program provides a novel and antiracist approach to mentorship for these premedical students. METHODS: The program recruited UIM/HEM premedical and medical students through a survey advertised by email, on the program's website, social media, and by word of mouth. The program paired students primarily with race-concordant mentors, all of whom were UCSF medical students. From October 2020 to June 2021, program mentees engaged in skills-building seminars based on an antiracism framework and received support for preparing medical school applications. The program administered preprogram and postprogram surveys to mentees, which were analyzed via quantitative and qualitative methods. RESULTS: Sixty-five premedical mentees and 56 medical student mentors participated in the program. The preprogram survey received 60 responses (92.3% response rate), and the postprogram survey received 48 responses (73.8% response rate). In the preprogram survey, 85.0% of mentees indicated that MCAT scores served as a barrier "a great deal" or "a lot," 80.0% indicated lack of faculty mentorship, and 76.7% indicated financial considerations. Factors that improved most from preprogram to postprogram were personal statement writing (33.8 percentage-point improvement, P < .001), peer mentorship (24.2 percentage-point improvement, P = .01), and knowledge of medical school application timeline (23.3% percentage-point improvement, P = .01). CONCLUSION: The mentorship program improved student confidence in various factors influencing the preparation of medical school applications and offered access to skills-building resources that mitigated existing structural barriers.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The benefits of mentorship and exposure to authentic clinical environments are well documented across the educational continuum.
“Although much of the literature has focused on pre-medical and medical students, the benefits of mentorship and exposure to authentic clinical environments are well documented across the educational continuum [7–10].”
From The Clinical Mentorship Program: a mixed-methods evaluation of a community-based medical education pathway program for high school students (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
The Discussion reports improved access to mentorship and reduced barriers to medical-school applications for underrepresented or historically excluded premedical students. The Methods say mentees were connected to clinical research and vaccine-distribution volunteer opportunities, but the paper does not establish benefits from exposure to authentic clinical environments or document benefits across the educational continuum. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797 · Cited by 8,181 · see citing works
Critical Race Theory, Race Equity, and Public Health: Toward Antiracism Praxis
Ford, C. L., & Airhihenbuwa, C. O. (2010) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2009.171058 · Cited by 995 · see citing works
Health equity among black women in the United States
Chinn, J. J., Martin, I. K., & Redmond, N. (2021) · Journal of Women's Health · doi:10.1089/jwh.2020.8868 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- [4]Campbell KM, Corral I, Infante Linares JL, Tumin D. Projected estimates of African American medical graduates of closed historically Black medical schools. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3(8): e2015220. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15220 32816033 PMC7441360 · DOI
- [5]Lett E, Murdock HM, Orji WU, Aysola J, Sebro R. Trends in racial/ethnic representation among US medical students. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2(9): e1910490. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10490 31483469 PMC6727686 · DOI · Paper page
- [7]Saha S, Komaromy M, Koepsell TD, Bindman AB. Patient–physician racial concordance and the perceived quality and use of health care. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159(9): 997– 1004. 10.1001/archinte.159.9.997 10326942 · DOI · Paper page
- [8]Rabinowitz HK, Diamond JJ, Veloski JJ, Gayle JA. The impact of multiple predictors on generalist physicians’ care of underserved populations. Am J Public Health 2000; 90(8): 1225– 8. 10.2105/AJPH.90.8.1225 10937001 PMC1446348 · DOI
- [10]Malawa Z, Gaarde J, Spellen S. Racism as a root cause approach: a new framework. Pediatrics 2021; 147(1): e2020015602. 10.1542/peds.2020-015602 33386339 · DOI · Paper page
- [11]Wright-Mair R, Ramos D, Passano B. Latinx college students’ strategies for resisting imposter syndrome at predominantly White institutions. J Lat Educ 2023.Published online February 17, 2023. 10.1080/15348431.2023.2180366 · DOI
- [14]Berk RA, Berg J, Mortimer R, Walton-Moss B, Yeo TP. Measuring the effectiveness of faculty mentoring relationships. Acad Med 2005; 80(1): 66– 71. 10.1097/00001888-200501000-00017 15618097 · DOI
- [20]Williams JC, Anderson N, Boatright D. Beyond diversity and inclusion: reparative justice in medical education. Acad Psychiatry 2021; 45(1): 84– 8. 10.1007/s40596-020-01386-8 33409943 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hunt, V. M., Cheng, J., de Lomba, W. C., & Warrier, S. (2026) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-026-09852-x
- Authors
- Rinderknecht, F.-A. B., Kouyate, A., Teklu, S., & Hahn, M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rinderknecht, Fatuma-Ayaan B.
- Venue
- Preventing Chronic Disease
- Published
- 2023-06-15
- Volume
- 20
- Pages
- E49-E49
- ISSN
- 1545-1151 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10275331
- OpenAlex
- W4380367447
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 5.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- Locations
- Preventing Chronic Disease (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Keywords
- anti-racism, mentoring programs, underrepresented in medicine, premedical students, personal statement writing, peer mentoring
- MeSH terms
- Antiracism, Humans, Mentors, Peer Group, Students, Medical, Students, Premedical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review