The DOI matches its Crossref record.
African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
Open accessAbstract
Since antimicrobials are used to fight infectious diseases, their proper use is a major world concern. The use of more than one medicine in the treatment of infectious disease is controversial hence the association therapy is used empirically to treat severe infections when one antimicrobial alone is not sufficient to account for all possible pathogens involved in the infection. The importance of understanding the mechanisms of gentamicin and ampicillin antibiotic action, as well as their interactions has important therapeutic implications. This research aimed to verify isolated and simultaneous antimicrobial action “in vitro” of gentamicin and ampicillin on strains of Enterococcus sp. in patients with Enterococcus sp. Fifty strains of Enterococcus sp . were used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of ampicillin and gentamicin, both isolated and associated, from which the fractional inhibition coefficient (FIC) was determined. A modified checkerboard method was also used for evaluating the association of the two antimicrobial agents. The results revealed that the antibiotics have a time- and dose-dependent response, and ampicillin has better results isolated than when in association. The results indicate a potential therapeutic failure in 32% of the associations in these agents. Thus, the most effective pharmaceutical care is facilitated by determining the antibiotics concentrations. Determining the MIC, MBC and FIC can be a powerful tool for guiding strategies to prevent bacterial resistance through the rational use of antibiotics, thereby averting and avoiding therapeutic failures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Potent α-amylase inhibitory activity of Indian Ayurvedic medicinal plants
P, S., Zinjarde, S. S., Bhargava, S. Y., & Kumar, A. R. (2011) · BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1186/1472-6882-11-5 · Cited by 353
Padayachee, M., Visser, J., Viljoen, E., Musekiwa, A., & Blaauw, R. (2019) · South African Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1080/16070658.2018.1449378 · Cited by 15
Hussien, N. I., El-kerdasy, H. I., Sorour, S. M., & Shoman, A. A. (2022) · Archives of Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1080/13813455.2019.1676262 · Cited by 11
Use of the Lactococcus lactis IO-1 for developing a novel functional beverage from coconut water
Faculty of Resource Science & Technology, U. M. S., Olaide, A. O., Lihan, S., Institute of Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation, U. M. S., Husain, A. A. S. A., Faculty of Resource Science & Technology, U. M. S., Saat, R., Faculty of Resource Science & Technology, U. M. S., Mohammad, F. S., Faculty of Resource Science & Technology, U. M. S., et al. (2020) · The Annals of the University Dunarea de Jos of Galati Fascicle VI – Food Technology · doi:10.35219/foodtechnology.2020.1.07 · Cited by 10
Tegegne, B. A., Yihunie, W., Aschale, Y., Belew, H., & Getachew, M. (2024) · Global Advances in Integrative Medicine and Health · doi:10.1177/27536130231225464 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Venue
- African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Academic Journals
- Published
- 2026-09-24
- ISSN
- 1996-0816 (ISSN-L)
- DOI
- 10.5897/ajpp
- OpenAlex
- W4205755059
- Cited by
- 889
- References
- 0
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5897/ajpp
- The paper
- African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. (2026). African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajpp
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.