Cited by 12Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyPlant Toxicity and Pharmacological PropertiesFood and Agricultural Sciences

Anti-nutritional and phytochemical profile of some plants grazed upon by ruminants in north central nigeria during the dry season (January to April)

Open access
Aliyu, Atiku, Olusola, Olalekan Oladipo, Gilead, Ebiegberi Forcados, Abdullahi, Shehu Usman, Michael, Danjuma Mancha·2016·International Journal of Livestock Production

Abstract

During the dry season, most plants and grasses dry up and ruminants are left with fewer plants to graze on. The plants available during such periods have relatively lower moisture contents and higher antinutritional factors because of the dry nature of the soil and prevalent atmospheric conditions. Increased levels of antinutritional factors above acceptable values, could have a detrimental effect on the metabolic and health status of animals grazing on such plants. This research work sought to determine the phytochemicals present and the levels of some antrinutritional factors in plants (Acacia senegal, Parkia biglobosa, Anogeissus leiocarpus, Acacia sieberiana, Vitellaria paradoxum, Tamarindus indica, Ficus carica, Ziziphus spinachristi Dichrostachus cinerea, Ziziphus mucronata) commonly grazed upon by ruminants in this region, to educate farmers and policy makers on the safety of these plants for ruminant nutrition. The plants were collected and identified, while phytochemical and anti-nutritional profiles were analyzed using standard spectrophotometric procedures. Quantitative antinutritional factors analysis showed that the level of oxalate varied from 15 to 180 mg/100 g, phytic acid from 23.51 to 53.41 mg/100 g and tannins from 0.486 to 1.850 mg/100 g, which are within internationally accepted permissible limits. Results of qualitative phytochemical analysis showed that flavonoids, tannin, cardiac glycosides and steroids were present in all the plants, while anthraquinones were absent. The results suggest that the browse plants in this location contain anti-nutrients at relatively low levels which make these plants safe for ruminant consumption. Key words: Plants, antinutritional factors, phytochemicals, grazing ruminants

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5897/ijlp2015.0268

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. EL-Olemyl MM, AL-Muhtadi FJ, Afifi AA (1994). Experimental phytochemisry. A Laboratory manual College of Pharmacy, King Saud University. King Saud University Press. pp. 1-134.
  2. Trease GE, Evans WC (1978). A textbook of Pharmacognosy 11 th edition. Bailliere Tindall London. P 530.
  3. Tutelian VA, Lashneva NV (2013). Biologically active substances of plant origin. Flavonols and flavones: Prevalence, dietary sources and consumption. Vopr Pitan 82(1):4-22.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aliyu, A., Olusola, O. O., Gilead, E. F., Abdullahi, S. U., & Michael, D. M.
Affiliations
National Veterinary Research Institute (NG)
Venue
International Journal of Livestock Production
Published
2016-04-30
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
19-23
ISSN
2141-2448 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2346413435
Cited by
12
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
International Journal of Livestock Production (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
Keywords
antinutritional factors, phytochemicals, ruminant grazing, browse plants, oxalate, phytic acid, tannins, flavonoids, Acacia senegal, Parkia biglobosa, Anogeissus leiocarpus, Acacia sieberiana, Tamarindus indica, Ficus carica, Dichrostachys cinerea, Ziziphus mucronata, dry season, ruminant nutrition, North Central Nigeria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review