Cited by 12Youth Development and Social SupportPhysical Education and PedagogyEducational Environments and Student Outcomes

Senior-Junior (Senpai-Kohai) Relationships in Secondary School Activities: —構造, 実態に着目して—

Open access
ONO, YUTA, SHOJI, ICHIKO·2015·The Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

本研究の目的は, 中学校と高校の部活動における先輩後輩関係の構造を明らかにし, また学年や性別, 部活動のタイプやレベルによって先輩後輩関係にどのような違いが生じているのか, さらに先輩後輩関係が, 部活動の活動内容や特徴によってどの程度予測されるのか明らかにすることであった。そのため, 全国の中学生と高校生711名を対象に質問紙調査を実施した。その結果, 中学生・高校生ともに1年生が最も先輩後輩関係を感じやすい立場にあり, 中学生では男子よりも女子の方が先輩後輩関係を厳しく捉える傾向にあることが明らかになった。また, 部活動のレベルやタイプ別の検討では, 競技・コンクール等で高いレベルで活躍する部活動や, 文化部よりも運動部において, 先輩後輩関係が明確になることが明らかになった。さらに, 部活動の方針や性格等が, 先輩後輩関係の各側面を高く予測することが明らかになった。

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5926/jjep.63.438

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Japanese culture and sports circles have a strong sense of hierarchy.

    “First, Japanese culture and sports circles have a strong sense of hierarchy (e.g., Ono & Shoji, 2015)”

    From Relationships Between Throwing Yips in Baseball, Experiential Avoidance, Cognitive Fusion, Values, and Social Factors (2024) · cites this paper as Ono & Shoji, 2015

    The discussion (page not identified in our copy) reports clearer senior–junior relationships and stronger discipline in Japanese secondary-school sports clubs than in cultural clubs. That supports the point about hierarchy in school sports clubs, but the study does not establish a strong sense of hierarchy across Japanese culture or sports circles generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ONO, Y., & SHOJI, I.
Affiliations
  • Waseda University (JP)
  • University of Tsukuba (JP)
Venue
The Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2015
Volume
63
Issue
4
Pages
438-452
ISSN
  • 0021-5015 (ISSN-L)
  • 2186-3075
OpenAlex
W2285055166
Cited by
12
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4
FWCI
4.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Terrestrial Environment Research Center (University of Tsukuba) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Keywords
club activities, high school students, gender differences, intergenerational relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review