Cited by 4Artificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEducational Technology and Pedagogy

Transformative potential of generative AI in higher education teaching practices

Open access
Charisma S. Ututalum·2025·Environment and Social Psychology

Abstract

This study examines the generative potential of AI in reshaping teaching in higher education as related to teaching methods and changing the nature of student involvement. The purpose of the study is to identify ways college educators perceive the roles of Generative AI within their classrooms and to critically evaluate both the benefits and drawbacks of its integration into courses. This adopted qualitative research design, a series of semi-structured interviews of 12 college instructors. The data were analyzed with the help of reflexive thematic analysis to identify important patterns and themes in responses. The findings suggest huge potential for Generative AI in supporting personalization of learning, providing students with tailored experiences in learning. Furthermore, it appears to be enhancing student engagement in learning by creating more interactive learning environments. Further, it can help in reducing the administrative burden on educators since repetitive tasks would be relieved and allow educators more time for meaningful interaction with students. However, the report points out some challenges for its implementation. These range from ethical issues regarding how AI affects academic integrity and personal privacy, proper education and training of teachers who use AI tools, as well as overreliance of students on technology-the likely outcome is impeded ability of students to develop new skills. The best strategy would be adopting the hybrid model, bringing the traditional methods of instruction along with Generative AI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.59429/esp.v10i9.3291

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Instructors favour hybrid models pairing GenAI-assisted ideation with structured critique routines.

    “Instructor perspectives similarly favour hybrid models that pair GenAI-assisted ideation with structured critique routines to protect critical skills and reduce overreliance, which informs the study's workflow controls and documentation requirements (Ututalum 2025).”

    From A Study on the Role of Midjourney, A Generative Artificial Intelligence Tool, in Enhancing Student Creativity in Illustration Design Classes (2026) · cites this paper as Ututalum 2025

    The Abstract (no page provided) describes interviews with 12 instructors, warns that student overreliance on AI may impede skill development, and recommends a hybrid model. The available passage ends mid-sentence and does not establish that instructors favoured a specific pairing of GenAI-assisted ideation with structured critique routines. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [31][31]. 31.Rai, N., & Thapa, B. (2015). A study on purposive sampling method in research. Kathmandu: Kathmandu School of Law, 5(1), 8-15.
  2. [34][34]. 34.Naz, N., Gulab, F., & Aslam, M. (2022). Development of qualitative semi-structured interview guide for case study research. Competitive Social Science Research Journal, 3(2), 42-52.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ututalum, C. S.
Corresponding author
Charisma S. Ututalum
Venue
Environment and Social Psychology
Published
2025-09-19
Volume
10
Issue
9
ISSN
  • 2424-7979 (ISSN-L)
  • 2424-8975
OpenAlex
W4414362777
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4
FWCI
4.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Environment and Social Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
Keywords
generative AI, university teaching, teaching methods, student engagement, personalized learning, academic integrity, student privacy, teacher training in AI, technology dependence, hybrid teaching model, instructor perceptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review