Eliciting and Analyzing Preservice Teachers' Mathematical Noticing
Abstract
In an effort to elicit elementary preservice teachers' mathematical noticing, mathematics teacher educators at 6 universities designed and implemented a 3-step task that used video, writing, and animation. The intent of the task was to elicit preservice teachers' mathematical noticing–that is, noticing specific to mathematics content and how students reason about content. Preservice teachers communicated their noticing through both written accounts and selfcreated animations. Findings showed that the specific city of mathematical noticing differed with the medium used and that preservice teachers focused on different mathematical content across the methods sections, illuminating the importance for mathematics teacher educators understanding of the noticing practices of the preservice teachers with whom they work. This report includes implications for using the task in methods courses and modifying course instruction to develop noticing following task implementation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Those PSTs who expressed their noticing about students did so with greater attention to mathematical details in their animations compared to written responses.
“At the same time, those PSTs who expressed their noticing about students did so with greater attention to mathematical details in their animations compared to written responses.”
From Prospective K-8 teachers’ noticing of student justifications and generalizations in the context of analyzing written artifacts and video-records (2021) · cites this paper as Amador et al. (2017)
How PSTs articulate their observations of student thinking might affect the assessment of PSTs' noticing skills.
“A study by Amador, Estapa, de Araujo, Kosko, and Weston (2017) showed that how PSTs articulate their observations of student thinking might affect the assessment of PSTs ' noticing skills.”
From Prospective K-8 teachers’ noticing of student justifications and generalizations in the context of analyzing written artifacts and video-records (2021) · cites this paper as Amador et al. (2017)
When articulating their noticing in writing, PSTs predominantly made observations about students, but when using animations to say what they noticed, PSTs focused mostly on a teacher.
“When articulating their noticing in writing, PSTs predominantly made observations about students, but when using animations to say what they noticed, PSTs focused mostly on a teacher.”
From Prospective K-8 teachers’ noticing of student justifications and generalizations in the context of analyzing written artifacts and video-records (2021) · cites this paper as Amador et al. (2017)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exploring the terrains of mathematics teacher noticing
Dindyal, J., Schack, E. O., Choy, B. H., & Sherin, M. G. (2021) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-021-01249-y · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Amador, J. M., Bragelman, J., & Superfine, A. C. (2020) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2020.103256 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Self-citationPreservice teachers’ articulated noticing through pedagogies of practice
Estapa, A., Amador, J. M., Kosko, K., Weston, T., de Araujo, Z., & Aming-Attai, R. (2018) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-017-9367-1 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationNoticing Student Mathematical Thinking Within the Context of Lesson Study
Güner, P., & Akyüz, D. (2019) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/0022487119892964 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“There is limited research, however, on preservice teachers’ noticing skills (e.g., Amador et al., 2017; Beattie et al., 2017; Sherin et al., 2011; van den Kieboom et al., 2017).”
BackgroundUlusoy, F. (2020) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2020.103103 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Amador, J. M., Estapa, A., Kosko, K., & Weston, T. (2019) · International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/0020739x.2019.1656828 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
“Both GoAnimate (now rebranded as Vyond) and LessonSketch are two such platforms (Amador et al., 2017; Amador, Weston, Estapa, Kosko, & De Araujo, 2016; Chazan & Herbst, 2012; Chen, 2012; De Araujo et al., 2015; Herbst, Aaron, & Chieu, 2013).”
BackgroundSelf-citationAmador, J. M. (2017) · Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.1080/14794802.2017.1315317 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationWebel, C., & Conner, K. A. (2017) · Mathematics Teacher Educator · doi:10.5951/mathteaceduc.6.1.0009 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Tyminski, A. M., Simpson, A. M., Land, T. J., Drake, C., & Dede, E. (2020) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-020-09472-2 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Lesson planimation: prospective elementary teachers’ interactions with mathematics curricula
Earnest, D., & Amador, J. M. (2017) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-017-9374-2 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationMagiera, M. T., & Zambak, V. S. (2021) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-020-00263-y · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Noticing in Action and in Reflection
Kılıç, H., & Doğan, O. (2021) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-020-10141-2 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Examining Mathematics Teachers Noticing the Rationality: Scenario-Based Training with AI Chatbot
Galiç, S., Urhan, S., Dost, Ş., & Lavicza, Z. (2025) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-025-00618-3 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“…to develop teacher noticing have employed video clubs (e.g., Sun & van Es, 2015), silent video tasks (e.g., Galiç et al., 2024a), animations (e.g., Amador et al., 2017), and online platforms (e.g., Larison et al., 2024; Tekin-Sitrava et al., 2024), or lesson study (e.g., Lee & Choy, 2017), there…”
Providing opportunities to develop prospective teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge
Appova, A., & Taylor, C. (2020) · The Mathematics Enthusiast · doi:10.54870/1551-3440.1501 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
In Pursuit of a Replication Culture in Mathematics Education
Star, J. R. (2021) · Implementation and Replication Studies in Mathematics Education · doi:10.1163/26670127-01010003 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Casey, S. A., & Amidon, J. C. (2020) · Mathematics Teacher Educator · doi:10.5951/mte.2020.0009 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Herridge, M., Tashiro, J., & Talanquer, V. (2021) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/d1rp00061f · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Lai, Y., Lischka, A. E., Strayer, J. F., & Adamoah, K. (2023) · The Journal of Mathematical Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.101030 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Moreno, M., Sánchez-Matamoros, G., & González, J. V. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15040418 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Kalinec-Craig, C. A., Diamond, J. M., & Shih, J. C. (2020) · Studying Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/17425964.2020.1783650 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Prospective teachers’ appraisals of technology platforms: comparing perception and complexity
Amador, J. M., Kosko, K. W., Weston, T. L., & Estapa, A. T. (2021) · Technology Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/1475939x.2021.1915372 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“We also recently explored GoAnimate as a tool for prospective teachers to communicate their thinking and professional noticing as they approximate practice (Amador et al., 2017; Weston et al., 2018).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSimulations as a Tool for Practicing Questioning
Webel, C., Conner, K. A., & Zhao, W. (2018) · ICME-13 monographs · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-70594-1_6 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Approximating Teaching: A Systematic Review of the Research
Cohen, J., Yonas, A. M., & Wilson, K. (2025) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543251368383 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Visions of the Possible: Using Drawings to Elicit and Support Visions of Teaching Mathematics
Ruef, J. L. (2020) · Mathematics Teacher Educator · doi:10.5951/mte-2019-0010 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Galiç, S., Dost, Ş., & Lavicza, Z. (2025) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-025-09703-4 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“These include analysis of students’ written solutions (e.g., Callejo & Zapatera, 2017; Parodi et al., 2024), animation-based tools (e.g., Amador et al., 2017; Lee & Choy, 2017), co-teaching approaches (e.g., Meadows & Caniglia, 2018), hypothetical learning trajectories (e.g., Ivars et al., 2018),…”
Matematik Öğretmenlerinin Fark Etme Becerilerinin Sessiz Video Görevi Aracılığıyla Analizi
Galiç, S., & Dost, Ş. (2025) · Buca eğitim fakültesi dergisi (Online)/Buca Eğitim Fakültesi dergisi · doi:10.53444/deubefd.1630097 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
What Do They Notice?: How Preservice Teachers Respond to Student Writing Across Time
Evans, K. I., Morgan, D. N., & Royan, E. (2025) · Literacy Research and Instruction · doi:10.1080/19388071.2025.2599775 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Teuscher, D., Cannon, T., & Christensen, S. (2023) · School Science and Mathematics · doi:10.1111/ssm.12632 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Examining Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Noticing Skills
Taşdan, B. T. (2019) · Türk bilgisayar ve matematik eğitimi dergisi · doi:10.16949/turkbilmat.451136
Mathematics Teacher Educator: Looking Back and Looking Forward
Hollebrands, K. F. (2019) · Mathematics Teacher Educator · doi:10.5951/mathteaceduc.8.1.0003
Mbhiza, H. W., Muthelo, D., & Chuene, K. (2021) · Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists · doi:10.17478/jegys.1015993
Using a Video-Tagging Tool to Support Facilitators of Video-Based Professional Development
Walton, M., & Walkoe, J. D. K. (2024) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/979-8-88730-543-120251016
Ülger, T. K., Kıryak, Z., & Ülger, B. B. (2026) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2026.102225 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Amador, J. M., Estapa, A., Araujo, Z. D., Kosko, K. W., & Weston, T. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Idaho (US)
- Iowa State University (US)
- University of Missouri (US)
- Kent State University (US)
- Middlebury College (US)
- Venue
- Mathematics Teacher Educator
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 158-177
- ISSN
- 2167-9789 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2594256728
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 15.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mathematics Teacher Educator (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministère de la Transition écologique et Solidaire
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Assessments
- Keywords
- pre-service teachers, primary teacher education, reflective writing, mathematics teacher educators, mathematics methods courses
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review