Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 274

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Meat Analogues: Plant based alternatives to meat products- A review

Joshi, VK, Kumar, Satish·2015·International Journal of Food and Fermentation Technology

Abstract

A meat analog, also called a meat substitute, mock meat, faux meat or imitation meat, approximates certain aesthetic qualities and chemical characteristics of specific types of meat. The consumption of vegetable proteins in food products has been increasing over the years because of animal diseases, global shortage of animal protein, strong demand for wholesome and religious (halal) food, and economic reasons. A meat-based diet requires a significantly greater amount of environmental resources per calorie compared to a more grain-based diet i.e. 2 to 15 kg plant foods are needed to produce 1 kg of meat. Developing new food products that are attractive to the consumers is a challenge. However, it is even more complex when these new foods are meant as a substitute for products that are highly appreciated and accepted, like meat. This challenge was accepted to develop new sustainable meat substitutes to reduce the negative environmental impact of industrial-scale meat production for human consumption. Happily there is an increasing importance of legume and oilseed proteins in the manufacturing of various functional food products due to their high-protein contents. However, the greatest obstacle to utilize these legumes and oilseeds is the presence of antinutrients, though these can successfully removed or inactivated by employing certain processing methods. Legumes and oilseeds provide well-balanced amino acid profiles when consumed with cereals. Soybean proteins, wheat gluten, cottonseed proteins, and other plant proteins have been used for preparation of meat anlogues successfully. Texturized vegetable proteins can substitute meat products while providing an economical, functional and high-protein food ingredient or can be consumed directly as a meat analogues. Meat analogues are successful because of their healthy image (cholesterol free), meat-like texture, and low cost. Mycoprotein a meat analog is fungal in origin and is used as a high-protein, low-fat, good texture and health-promoting food ingredient. Texturized vegetable proteins and a number of mycoprotein based products are accepted as analogues food. These are some constrains also in the production and consumption of meat analogues. Further research however is required to optimize molecular, nutritional, and functional properties of alternative protein sources to meat and to spread out the current knowledge to encourage the beneficial effects of alternative protein sources, as outlined in this review.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5958/2277-9396.2016.00001.5

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Joshi, V., & Kumar, S.
Venue
International Journal of Food and Fermentation Technology
Published
2015
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
107
ISSN
  • 2249-1570 (ISSN-L)
  • 2277-9396
OpenAlex
W2556614946
Cited by
274
References
0
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.