The DOI matches its Crossref record.
1988 IUCN red list of threatened animals
Open accessAbstract
acitivities.In this way, future Red Lists may become increasingly precise and compelling as they succinctly signal the condition of the world's heritage of species.Meanwhile, we must take up the cause of whole groups of species whose existence is suddenly imperilled -amphibians and sharks are immediate examples, with very different causational factors implicated.Another approach to priorities in the conservation of biodiversity is identifying places rich in species and concentrating action on preservation and protection of these areas, labelled "hot spots" by Norman Myers.Recently, Russell Mittermeier has extended this idea to the political geography of the world and identified megadiversity countries that deserve focussed conservation attention.A suggested Green List of species important ecologically, evolutionarily, or economically may be another worthwhile venture.Such initiatives as well as the Red List are all valuable in reinforcing the message that people and their governments must act now if we are to conserve the world's natural heritage.In closing, it is appropriate to acknowledge the extraordinary effort made by Jane Thornback in compiling this and previous Red Lists.It is also fitting to note that such labour and the expenses of producing the Red List, the Red Data Books, the SSC Action Plans, and related publications will be in vain unless conservationists of all kinds work to see that there are indeed adequate responses to the warnings of irrevocable losses of species that these publications provide.May this book's readers so commit themselves for the benefit of future generations.George B. Rabb Chairman, Species Survival Commission IUCN, The World Conservation Union Michaelis, F.B. (1985).Threatened fish.A Report on the threatened fish of inland waters in Australia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Frankham, R. (2005) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.05.002 · Cited by 2,354
Predicting extinction risk in declining species
Purvis, A., Gittleman, J. L., Cowlishaw, G., & Mace, G. M. (2000) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1234 · Cited by 1,768
The Status of the World's Land and Marine Mammals: Diversity, Threat, and Knowledge
Schipper, J., Chanson, J. S., Chiozza, F., Cox, N. A., Hoffmann, M., Katariya, V., Lamoreux, J., Rodrigues, A. S. L., Stuart, S. N., Temple, H. J., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1165115 · Cited by 1,534
Self-citationEffectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity
Rodrigues, A. S. L., Andelman, S. J., Bakarr, M. I., Boitani, L., Brooks, T. M., Cowling, R. M., Fishpool, L. D. C., da Fonseca, G. A. B., Gaston, K. J., Hoffmann, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02422 · Cited by 1,525
Extinction Vulnerability and Selectivity: Combining Ecological and Paleontological Views
McKinney, M. L. (1997) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.495 · Cited by 1,008
Metadata
- Publisher
- [s.n.]
- Published
- 1988
- OpenAlex
- W2271172517
- Cited by
- 972
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.98
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 1988 IUCN red list of threatened animals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5962/bhl.title.45189
- The paper
- 1988 IUCN red list of threatened animals. (1988). https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.45189
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.