Cited by 13Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentLung Cancer Research Studies

In Chemotherapy for Lung Cancer, Sometimes Less is More

Open access
Roeland, Eric, Loprinzi, Charles, Moynihan, Timothy J., Smith, Thomas J., Temel, Jennifer·2013·Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network

Abstract

Chemotherapy remains the backbone of care for patients with metastatic cancer and provides increasing hope for patients and their families as novel drug targets and therapeutic agents are discovered.Over the past decade, the therapeutic arsenal has markedly expanded, from nitrogen mustard and folic acid antagonists of the mid-20th century to the targeted regimens of "personalized" medicine today.In patients with metastatic disease, chemotherapy can slow disease progression, leading to prolonged survival, and palliate symptoms.Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancerrelated mortality in the United States because of both the high prevalence of advanced disease at diagnosis and the low rate of cure of early-stage disease.Thus, many patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receive chemotherapy with the goal of prolonging life, relieving symptoms, and improving quality of life (QOL).Although chemotherapy can achieve these goals in selected patients with metastatic NSCLC and a good performance status (PS), it has a limited role in patients whose cancer has progressed through multiple lines of therapy and those with a poor PS (eg, ECOG 3 or 4).The response rates for patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with both a platinum and a taxane have been reported to be only 2% for third-line and 0% for fourth-line chemotherapy, 1 which is insufficient to provide a significant survival benefit. 2 Data regarding patients with NSCLC with a PS of 2 remains an unsolved issue, and carefully designed phase III trials are necessary to better define optimal treatment for patients with a borderline PS. [3][4][5] Thus, ASCO and NCCN guidelines have concluded that patients with a PS greater than 3 do not benefit from chemotherapy, except erlotinib for epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive patients and crizotinib for ALK-positive patients.[6][7][8] Despite these published national guidelines, the current trend is for patients with metastatic NSCLC to receive multiple lines of chemotherapy, even in the face of a declining or poor PS. [9][10][11][12] The continued discoveries of novel, targeted therapies are making it increasingly more challenging for patients and oncologists to forgo additional treatment, because of the hope of finding one that will lead to long-term progression-free survival.We all hope that the next erlotinib or crizotinib is on the horizon and that we will have effective targeted therapies available for all patients with metastatic NSCLC.This hope makes it difficult for oncologists to not offer that "one additional treatment" when faced with a patient whose condition is declining.However, the downside to this eternal optimism is that patients may receive additional lines of therapy with no clear benefit and with real potential harm.Although data have not conclusively demonstrated that prolonged chemotherapy may truly harm or even decrease survival in patients with metastatic cancer, one study examining Medicare patients with congestive heart failure or any 1 of 5 different malignancies supported the theory that hospice referral led to an improved survival, 13 and another study examining continued chemotherapy to the premortem period suggested that it only delays hospice referral and does not improve survival.14 A recently conducted prospective, randomized, single-institution clinical trial provides important insight into the question of prolonged chemotherapy administration in patients with incurable NSCLC.15 In this study, 151 patients with

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.6004/jnccn.2013.0034

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Saito A, Landrum MB, Neville B, et al. The effects on survival of continuing chemotherapy to near death. BMC Palliat Care 2011;10:14.
  2. Connor SR, Pyenson B, Fitch K, et al. Comparing hospice and nonhospice patient survival among patients who die within a three-year window. J Pain Symptom Manage 2007;33:238-246.
  3. Shanafelt TD, Loprinzi C, Marks R, et al. Are chemotherapy response rates related to treatment- induced survival prolongations in patients with advanced cancer? J Clin Oncol 2004;22:1966-1974.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roeland, E., Loprinzi, C., Moynihan, T. J., Smith, T. J., & Temel, J.
Affiliations
  • Moores Cancer Center (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Published
2013-03
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
232-235
ISSN
  • 1540-1405 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-1413
OpenAlex
W1826306349
Cited by
13
References
33
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lung Cancer Research Studies
Keywords
metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, chemotherapy, performance status, poor performance status, treatment de-escalation, quality of life, palliative care, targeted therapy, ECOG performance status, quality-adjusted life years, shared decision-making
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Palliative Care, Quality of Life, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review