Cited by 386Information and Cyber SecurityCybersecurity and Cyber Warfare StudiesInfrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis

Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity, Version 1.1

National Institute of Standards and Technology·2018

Abstract

Version 1.1 of this Cybersecurity Framework refines, clarifies, and enhances Version 1.0, which was issued in February 2014.It incorporates comments received on the two drafts of Version 1.1.Version 1.1 is intended to be implemented by first-time and current Framework users.Current users should be able to implement Version 1.1 with minimal or no disruption; compatibility with Version 1.0 has been an explicit objective.The following table summarizes the changes made between Version 1.0 and Version 1.1.Table NTR-1 -Summary of changes between Framework Version 1.0 and Version 1.1. UpdateDescription of Update Clarified that terms like "compliance" can be confusing and mean something very different to various Framework stakeholders Added clarity that the Framework has utility as a structure and language for organizing and expressing compliance with an organization's own cybersecurity requirements.However, the variety of ways in which the Framework can be used by an organization means that phrases like "compliance with the Framework" can be confusing.A new section on selfassessment Added Section 4.0 Self-Assessing Cybersecurity Risk with the Framework to explain how the Framework can be used by organizations to understand and assess their cybersecurity risk, including the use of measurements.Greatly expanded explanation of using Framework for Cyber Supply Chain Risk Management purposes An expanded Section 3.3 Communicating Cybersecurity Requirements with Stakeholders helps users better understand Cyber Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM), while a new Section 3.4 Buying Decisions highlights use of the Framework in understanding risk associated with commercial off-the-shelf products and services.Additional Cyber SCRM criteria were added to the Implementation Tiers.Finally, a Supply Chain Risk Management Category, including multiple Subcategories, has been added to the Framework Core. Refinements to better account for authentication, authorization, and identity proofingThe language of the Access Control Category has been refined to better account for authentication, authorization, and identity proofing.This included adding one Subcategory each for Authentication and Identity Proofing.Also, the Category has been renamed to Identity Management and Access Control (PR.AC) to better represent the scope of the Category and corresponding Subcategories.Better explanation of the relationship between Implementation Tiers and Profiles Added language to Section 3.2 Establishing or Improving a Cybersecurity Program on using Framework Tiers in Framework implementation.Added language to Framework Tiers to reflect integration of Framework considerations within organizational risk management programs.The Framework Tier concepts were also refined.Updated Figure 2.0 to include actions from the Framework Tiers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.6028/nist.cswp.04162018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • NIST proposed a framework [46] to address and manage cybersecurity risks related to industrial control systems.

    “In order to address and manage the cybersecurity risks related to industrial control systems, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) located in the United States of America has proposed a framework [46].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Published
2018-04-16
OpenAlex
W4234388477
Cited by
386
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 4
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
Keywords
critical infrastructure cybersecurity, NIST Cybersecurity Framework, cyber risk management, self-assessment, profiles, commercial off-the-shelf components, stakeholder communication, organizational risk management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review