The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recommended security controls for federal information systems and organizations
Open accessAbstract
The answers to these questions are not given in isolation but rather in the context of an effective information security program for the organization that identifies, controls, and mitigates risks to its information and information systems.6 The security controls defined in Special Publication 800-53 and recommended for use by organizations in protecting their information systems should be employed in conjunction with and as part of a well-defined and documented information security program.An effective information security program should include:• Periodic assessments of risk, including the magnitude of harm that could result from the unauthorized access, use, disclosure, disruption, modification, or destruction of information and information systems that support the operations and assets of the organization;• Policies and procedures that are based on risk assessments, cost-effectively reduce information security risks to an acceptable level and address information security throughout the life cycle of each organizational information system; 3 An information system is a discrete set of information resources organized expressly for the collection, processing, maintenance, use, sharing, dissemination, or disposition of information.Information systems also include specialized systems such as industrial/process controls systems, telephone switching/private branch exchange (PBX) systems, and environmental control systems.4 Organizational operations include mission, functions, image, and reputation.5 Security control effectiveness addresses the extent to which the controls are implemented correctly, operating as intended, and producing the desired outcome with respect to meeting the security requirements for the information system in its operational environment.6 The E-Government Act (P.L. 107-347), passed by the one hundred and seventh Congress and signed into law by the President in December 2002, recognized the importance of information security to the economic and national security interests of the United States.Title III of the E-Government Act, entitled the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA), emphasizes the need for organizations to develop, document, and implement an organization-wide program to provide security for the information systems that support its operations and assets. PAGE 1Special Publication 800-53, Revision 1systems, or groups of information systems, as appropriate;• Security awareness training to inform personnel (including contractors and other users of information systems that support the operations and assets of the organization) of the information security risks associated with their activities and their responsibilities in complying with organizational policies and procedures designed to reduce these risks;• Periodic testing and evaluation of the effectiveness of information security policies, procedures, practices, and security controls to be performed with a frequency depending on risk, but no less than annually;• A process for planning, implementing, evaluating, and documenting remedial actions to address any deficiencies in the information security policies, procedures, and practices of the organization;• Procedures for detecting, reporting, and responding to security incidents; and• Plans and procedures for continuity of operations for information systems that support the operations and assets of the organization.It is of paramount importance that responsible officials within the organization understand the risks and other factors that could adversely affect organizational operations, organizational assets, or individuals.Moreover, these officials must understand the current status of their security programs and the security controls planned or in place to protect their information systems in order to make informed judgments and investments that appropriately mitigate risks to an acceptable level.The ultimate objective is to conduct the day-to-day operations of the organization and to accomplish the organization's stated mission(s) with what the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-130 defines as adequate security, or security commensurate with risk, including the magnitude of harm to individuals, the organization, or its assets resulting from the unauthorized access, use, disclosure, disruption, modification, or destruction of information.determining security control effectiveness.The guidelines provided in this special publication are applicable to all federal information systems 8 other than those systems designated as national security systems as defined in 44 U.S.C., Section 3542.9 The guidelines have been broadly developed from a technical perspec to complement similar guidelines for national security systems.This publication is intended to provide guidance to federal agencies implementing FIPS 200, Minimum Security Requirements for Federal Information and Information Systems.In addition to the agencies of the federal government, state, local, an
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rukhin, A., Sota, J., Nechvatal, J., Smid, M., Barker, E., Leigh, S., Levenson, M., Vangel, M., Banks, D., Heckert, A., et al. (2000) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-22 · Cited by 1,867
Cited by
A Review of Security Standards and Frameworks for IoT-Based Smart Environments
Karie, N. M., Sahri, N. M., Yang, W., Valli, C., & Kebande, V. R. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3109886 · Cited by 212
Cyberphysical Security for Industrial Control Systems Based on Wireless Sensor Networks
Lu, T., Guo, X., Li, Y., Peng, Y., Zhang, X., Xie, F., & Gao, Y. (2014) · International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks · doi:10.1155/2014/438350 · Cited by 31
An integrated framework for control system simulation and regulatory compliance monitoring
Mahoney, W., & Gandhi, R. A. (2011) · International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection · doi:10.1016/j.ijcip.2011.03.002 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Ross, R., Katzke, S., Johnson, L. A., Swanson, M., Stoneburner, G., & Rogers, G.
- Published
- 2006
- OpenAlex
- W2620524678
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 1
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recommended security controls for federal information systems and organizations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.6028/nist.sp.800-53r1
- The paper
- Ross, R., Katzke, S., Johnson, L. A., Swanson, M., Stoneburner, G., & Rogers, G. (2006). Recommended security controls for federal information systems and organizations. https://doi.org/10.6028/nist.sp.800-53r1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.