Cited by 69Wireless Networks and ProtocolsMobile Ad Hoc NetworksSecurity in Wireless Sensor Networks

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Establishing wireless robust security networks: a guide to IEEE 802.11i

Abstract

The Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) promotes the U.S. economy and public welfare by providing technical leadership for the nation's measurement and standards infrastructure.ITL develops tests, test methods, reference data, proof of concept implementations, and technical analysis to advance the development and productive use of information technology.ITL's responsibilities include the development of technical, physical, administrative, and management standards and guidelines for the cost-effective security and privacy of sensitive unclassified information in Federal computer systems.This Special Publication 800-series reports on ITL's research, guidance, and outreach efforts in computer security and its collaborative activities with industry, government, and academic organizations.Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately.Such identification is

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.6028/nist.sp.800-97

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Network segmentation is considered a good security practice and can be achieved by implementing BP1-CPNI, IEC 62351, and NIST 800-82.

    “Since network segmentation [110,111] is considered as a good security practice, it can be achieved by implementing BP1-CPNI [109], IEC 62351 [112], and NIST 800-82.”
  • Since the MC-MitM attacker does not delete the original security association or create a new connection using a Wi-Fi passphrase, the client and real AP continue to maintain their security association and retain details about PMK and association identifiers in state tables stored in the cache of their Wi-Fi chips.

    “As mentioned previously, since the MC-MitM attacker does not delete the original security association between the client and real AP or does not create a new connection using a Wi-Fi passphrase, the client and real AP continue to maintain their security association (current state machine) and retain details about PMK (a hash value derived from Wi-Fi passphrase and SSID) and association identifiers”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Frankel, S. E., Eydt, B., Owens, L., & Scarfone, K. A.
Affiliations
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US)
Published
2007
OpenAlex
W2624248292
Cited by
68
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Wireless Networks and Protocols
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Security in Wireless Sensor Networks
Keywords
wireless network security, wireless networks, network security standards

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review