The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Insecurity of Wireless Networks
Abstract
Wi-Fi is the standard protocol for wireless networks used extensively in US critical infrastructures. Since the Wired Equivalency Privacy (WEP) security protocol was broken, the Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA) protocol has been considered the secure alternative compatible with hardware developed for WEP. However, in November 2008, researchers developed an attack on WPA, allowing forgery of Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) packets. Subsequent enhancements have enabled ARP poisoning, cryptosystem denial of service, and man-in-the-middle attacks. Open source systems and methods (OSSM) have long been used to secure networks against such attacks. This article reviews OSSMs and the results of experimental attacks on WPA. These experiments re-created current attacks in a laboratory setting, recording both wired and wireless traffic. The article discusses methods of intrusion detection and prevention in the context of cyberphysical protection of critical Internet infrastructure. The basis for this research is a specialized (and undoubtedly incomplete) taxonomy of Wi-Fi attacks and their adaptations to existing countermeasures and protocol revisions. Ultimately, this article aims to provide a clearer picture of how and why wireless protection protocols and encryption must achieve a more scientific basis for detecting and preventing such attacks.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Due to the nature of AES, WPA2 requires replacing older hardware because AES has extensive processing demands.
“Due to the nature of AES, WPA2 requires replacing older hardware because AES has extensive processing demands [24].”
From A Comprehensive Attack Flow Model and Security Analysis for Wi-Fi and WPA3 (2018) · cites this paper as [24]
Citations
Cites
IEEE 802.11n: enhancements for higher throughput in wireless LANs
Xiao, Y. (2005) · IEEE Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/mwc.2005.1561948 · Cited by 344
Practical attacks against WEP and WPA
Tews, E., & Beck, M. (2009) · doi:10.1145/1514274.1514286 · Cited by 259
Establishing wireless robust security networks: a guide to IEEE 802.11i
Frankel, S. E., Eydt, B., Owens, L., & Scarfone, K. A. (2007) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-97 · Cited by 68
A Practical Message Falsification Attack on WPA
Ohigashi, T., & Morii, M. (2010) · Cited by 35
Wireless Intrusion Detection Systems
alshurbaji, I. H., & al amer, R. (2013) · Cited by 23
Wireless Intrusion Detection Systems
Essentials, G. S. (2005) · Cited by 9
Cryptanalysis of IEEE 802.11i TKIP
Halvorsen, F. M., & Haugen, O. A. (2009) · BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) · Cited by 8
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- 2011, Technology Roadmap: Smart Grids, Int’l Energy Agency
- Kuruganti, 2009, Wireless System Considerations When Implementing NERC Critical Infrastructure Protection Standards
- Frequently Asked Questions: How Many Smart Meters Are Installed in the U.S. and Who Has Them?
- Vulnerability Analysis of Energy Delivery Systems
- 2011, Roadmap to Achieve Energy Delivery Systems Cybersecurity, Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group
- 2011, Department of Energy Releases New Roadmap to Guide Public-Private Cybersecurity Initiatives
- 2011, Trustworthy Cyberspace: Strategic Plan for the Federal Cyberse-curity R&D Program, US Nat’l Science and Technology Council
- 2007, IEEE Std. 802. pp.11–200, Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications, IEEE
- Geier, 2002, 802.11 WEP: Concepts and Vulnerability, Wi-Pi Planet
- Cheung, 2008, How to CrackWEP-Part 1: Setup and Network Recon
- Cheung, 2008, How to Crack VVEP—Part 2: Performing the Crack
- Cheung, 2008, How to Crack VVEP—Part 3: Securing Your WLAN, Tom’s Guide
- Robinson, 2004, Examining 802.1Ii and WPA, Network Computing
- 2010, WPA2 Hole196 Vulnerability: Exploits and Remediation Strategies
- Combs, TShark-Dump and Analyze Network Traffic, Wireshark
- Gupta, 2009, The New Attack on WPA/TIGP: Much Ado about Nothing?
- Kershaw, 2011, Kismet Readme
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Comprehensive Attack Flow Model and Security Analysis for Wi-Fi and WPA3
Kohlios, C. P., & Hayajneh, T. (2018) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics7110284 · Cited by 77
“Due to the nature of AES, WPA2 requires replacing older hardware because AES has extensive processing demands [24].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Sheldon, F. T., Weber, J. M., Yoo, S.-M., & Pan, W. D.
- Affiliations
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
- Dynetics (United States) (US)
- University of Alabama (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Security & Privacy Magazine
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 54-61
- ISSN
- 1540-7993 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006029501
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 6.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Security & Privacy (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Wireless Networks and Protocols
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Security in Wireless Sensor Networks
- Keywords
- Wi-Fi security, WPA, WEP, ARP spoofing, ARP poisoning, man-in-the-middle attacks, open-source security tools, intrusion detection, intrusion prevention, critical infrastructure protection, wireless network attacks, attack taxonomy, wireless encryption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review