Cited by 45Network Security and Intrusion DetectionWireless Networks and ProtocolsSecurity in Wireless Sensor Networks

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Insecurity of Wireless Networks

Sheldon, Frederick T., Weber, John Mark, Yoo, Seong-Moo, Pan, W. David·2012·IEEE Security & Privacy Magazine

Abstract

Wi-Fi is the standard protocol for wireless networks used extensively in US critical infrastructures. Since the Wired Equivalency Privacy (WEP) security protocol was broken, the Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA) protocol has been considered the secure alternative compatible with hardware developed for WEP. However, in November 2008, researchers developed an attack on WPA, allowing forgery of Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) packets. Subsequent enhancements have enabled ARP poisoning, cryptosystem denial of service, and man-in-the-middle attacks. Open source systems and methods (OSSM) have long been used to secure networks against such attacks. This article reviews OSSMs and the results of experimental attacks on WPA. These experiments re-created current attacks in a laboratory setting, recording both wired and wireless traffic. The article discusses methods of intrusion detection and prevention in the context of cyberphysical protection of critical Internet infrastructure. The basis for this research is a specialized (and undoubtedly incomplete) taxonomy of Wi-Fi attacks and their adaptations to existing countermeasures and protocol revisions. Ultimately, this article aims to provide a clearer picture of how and why wireless protection protocols and encryption must achieve a more scientific basis for detecting and preventing such attacks.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/msp.2012.60

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Due to the nature of AES, WPA2 requires replacing older hardware because AES has extensive processing demands.

    “Due to the nature of AES, WPA2 requires replacing older hardware because AES has extensive processing demands [24].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. 2011, Technology Roadmap: Smart Grids, Int’l Energy Agency
  2. Kuruganti, 2009, Wireless System Considerations When Implementing NERC Critical Infrastructure Protection Standards
  3. Frequently Asked Questions: How Many Smart Meters Are Installed in the U.S. and Who Has Them?
  4. Vulnerability Analysis of Energy Delivery Systems
  5. 2011, Roadmap to Achieve Energy Delivery Systems Cybersecurity, Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group
  6. 2011, Department of Energy Releases New Roadmap to Guide Public-Private Cybersecurity Initiatives
  7. 2011, Trustworthy Cyberspace: Strategic Plan for the Federal Cyberse-curity R&D Program, US Nat’l Science and Technology Council
  8. 2007, IEEE Std. 802. pp.11–200, Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications, IEEE
  9. Geier, 2002, 802.11 WEP: Concepts and Vulnerability, Wi-Pi Planet
  10. Cheung, 2008, How to CrackWEP-Part 1: Setup and Network Recon
  11. Cheung, 2008, How to Crack VVEP—Part 2: Performing the Crack
  12. Cheung, 2008, How to Crack VVEP—Part 3: Securing Your WLAN, Tom’s Guide
  13. Robinson, 2004, Examining 802.1Ii and WPA, Network Computing
  14. 2010, WPA2 Hole196 Vulnerability: Exploits and Remediation Strategies
  15. Combs, TShark-Dump and Analyze Network Traffic, Wireshark
  16. Gupta, 2009, The New Attack on WPA/TIGP: Much Ado about Nothing?
  17. Kershaw, 2011, Kismet Readme

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sheldon, F. T., Weber, J. M., Yoo, S.-M., & Pan, W. D.
Affiliations
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
  • Dynetics (United States) (US)
  • University of Alabama (US)
Venue
IEEE Security & Privacy Magazine
Published
2012-07
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
54-61
ISSN
1540-7993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006029501
Cited by
45
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5
FWCI
6.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Security & Privacy (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Wireless Networks and Protocols
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Security in Wireless Sensor Networks
Keywords
Wi-Fi security, WPA, WEP, ARP spoofing, ARP poisoning, man-in-the-middle attacks, open-source security tools, intrusion detection, intrusion prevention, critical infrastructure protection, wireless network attacks, attack taxonomy, wireless encryption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review