技術型高中學生的媽寶行為覺知、學業成就動機與手機成癮之相關研究 Perceived Helicopter Parenting Related to Vocational Senior High School Students’Academic Achievement and Smartphone Addiction
Open accessAbstract
隨著行動網路普及,人與人之間的通訊變得更加便利,也造成人們高度依賴手機。然而,手機使用失去控制已對健康造成嚴重危害,如成癮等。孩子的行為控制經常依賴於父母教養方式,尤其是華人父母在教養孩子方面與歐美國家的父母相比,會更加關注地自己的子女。這代表華人父母更關注於孩子的學業和生活,並形成更多按照父母親意志且欠缺獨立思考的媽寶,這將可能激起或停止孩子的手機成癮問題。本研究針對技術型高中學生進行問卷調查,有效問卷共290份,並對數據進行結構方程模式的驗證性因素分析。本研究採用生態系統理論,由AMOS 20建模,並從數據分析的結果進行分析。本研究發現:一、生活媽寶行為覺知與課業媽寶行為覺知對學業成就動機呈現負向影響;二、學業成就動機對手機成癮呈現負向影響;三、生活媽寶行為覺知與課業媽寶行為覺知對手機成癮呈現正向影響;四、生活媽寶行為覺知與課業媽寶行為覺知經由學業成就動機對手機成癮有正向的間接影響。研究結果證明,過分依賴父母的技術型高中學生有較低的學業成就動機,並無法控制手機的使用,因此造成手機成癮。換言之,父母應避免過多的日常生活與學業控制,以減少孩子手機使用的需求性。 Background and Purpose of Research Adolescents use their smartphones for various purposes, for example, following distance/online learning, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic, staying in touch with friends, having fun using social media tools. According to the social ecological model, risk behaviors, like substance consumption, are regarded as behavior problems. Relatively, etiology is derived of youths’ embeddedness surrounded by their social networks, mainly throughout sensitive development periods (Bishop et al., 2020). Given the prevalence of smartphone addiction among young students, previous studies have explored the relationships between smartphone addiction and students’ learning and indicated there is negative outcomes of smartphone resulting from overuse of mobile phones, including poor sleep quality. However, there some antecedents of smartphone addiction which has not extendedly studied, for example, parenting style, thus, the present study aimed to explore the correlates between parenting styles, academic achievement and smartphone addiction. Parenting that reflects a combination of support and behavioral control has been linked to numerous indices of academic well-being and live functioning from early childhood through adolescence. In regarding the term helicopter parenting indicated that parents involve hovering behaviors and are potentially over-involved in the lives of their child or in their academic work (Padilla-Walker & Nelson, 2012). But empirical research has not adequately used these two construct from other controlling parenting practices to predict children’s smartphone addiction, thus, the present study applied two types of helicopter parenting: live hovering and academic hovering of parenting for of emerging adults, to explain the prediction of children’s smartphone addiction. According to Bronfenbrenner (1979) micro ecological system that discusses the association between person-process-content (PPC), who described “person-process-context model” (PPCM) that occurs variability in development procedure as considered in this paper as a functional context (mobile phone usage), person (parenting styles) and process (academic achievement). Not only has cultural ecology be likely to pursue its complications in issues originating from social and cultural topics, but intricate schools of understanding of culture-nature relationship have developed for certain risk behavior. For example, helicopter parenting is more obvious in Chinese families than Western ones, even though the parents want their children to grow up to be independent and think for themselves. Particularly, Chinese parents are more concerned about their children’s schoolwork when they are teenagers, which leads to increased helicopter parenting problems, exacerbating issues such as lack of independence, lack of control, and not knowing how to self-manage smartphone use, which can in turn lead to smartphone addiction. If parents are in constant hovering of their children’s lives or schoolwork, children develop dependent behaviors. Some studies have indicated that a child’s dependent behaviors result in lower motivation to learn and reduced academic achievement. In line with this, drawn on PPCM to understanding the role of academic hovering and live hovering affect participants’ smartphone addiction mediated by academic achievement, hypotheses are proposed as follows. Hypotheses • (1) Live hovering has a negative effect on academic achievement. • (2) Academic hovering has a negative effect on academic achievement. • (3) Academic achievement has a negative effect on smartphone addiction. • (4) Live hovering has a positive effect on smartphone addiction. • (5) Academic hovering has a positive effect on smartphone addiction. Methodology Questionnaire was designed by adapting and translated from previous researched and gave to domain experts to ensure the content validity. Afterward, a purposive sampling was adapted in this study, a total of 400 questionnaires were distributed to 4 vocational senior high schools located in Taipei City. 354 of which were collected, resulting in a questionnaire collection rate of 88.5%. After 64 invalid questionnaires were excluded, 290 valid questionnaires remained, resulting in a valid questionnaire collection rate of 81.92%. Factor analysis was conducted on the valid questionnaires. Results First, helicopter parenting, live and academic hovering had a negative association with academic achievement, with an expla
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PPC can be used to explore PPC interaction in educational settings, especially in the context of Internet-based addictive behaviors.
“Hong et al. (13) further found that PPC can be used to explore the PPC interaction in educational settings, especially in the context of Internet-based addictive behaviors.”
From Effects of Short Video Addiction on the Motivation and Well-Being of Chinese Vocational College Students (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
Despite possible biased responses, the hypothetical paths between constructs are still valid because this was a correlation study aimed to investigate the correlation between paths.
“Although there may be biased responses in this study, since this was a correlation study, not a descriptive statistical study, which aimed to investigate the correlation between paths (13), it is evident from the validation results that the hypothetical paths between constructs are still valid.”
From Effects of Short Video Addiction on the Motivation and Well-Being of Chinese Vocational College Students (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ye, J.-H., Wu, Y.-T., Wu, Y.-F., Chen, M.-Y., & Ye, J.-N. (2022) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.847672 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Self-citationSun, R.-Q., Sun, G.-F., & Ye, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1185353 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationOlaya-Cotera, S., Iparraguirre-Villanueva, O., & Flores-Castañeda, R. O. (2025) · Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies · doi:10.36941/ajis-2025-0014 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Peng, B., Hu, N., Li, H., Pang, B., Lv, M., Wang, X., & Li, Y. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-66207-6 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hong
- Venue
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
- Published
- 2021-04-01
- OpenAlex
- W4310667639
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- zh
- Open access
- green
- doaj.org
- Licence
- cc-by-sa
- Locations
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
- Social Sciences › Education › Parental Involvement in Education
- Keywords
- helicopter parenting, academic achievement motivation, smartphone addiction, vocational high school students, parenting styles, Chinese parents, socio-ecological model, mediating effect, adolescent smartphone use, parental control, COVID-19 pandemic learning, social media use, sleep quality, self-efficacy, self-regulation, self-determination theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review