Cited by 1Auditing, Earnings Management, GovernanceRobotic Process Automation ApplicationsCorporate Governance and Financial Management

Reconfiguring Auditor Judgment Beyond the Human: Audit Data Analytics, Artificial Intelligence, and Audit Quality in Emerging Economies

Open access
Akossey, Solomon Ezonle, Djan, Ellen Bondzewa, Cobbinah, Janet, Nsiah, Elizabeth Kusi-·2026·Journal of Posthumanism

Abstract

This study examines how audit data analytics (ADA) and artificial intelligence (AI) reconfigure auditor judgment and audit quality in emerging economies from a posthumanist perspective. Moving beyond anthropocentric assumptions that position professional judgment as an exclusively human cognitive act, the study conceptualises auditor judgment as a distributed and hybrid process emerging from human–AI assemblages embedded within regulatory, institutional, and technological infrastructures. Using survey data from 326 auditors across seven emerging economies and applying partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS SEM), complemented by logistic regression analysis of audit report lag and financial restatements, the study investigates the relational effects of ADA intensity, AI integration, and contextual support on judgment quality and audit outcomes. The findings demonstrate that ADA and AI significantly enhance audit quality through both direct mechanisms and indirect pathways mediated by auditor judgment quality, while regulatory support and technological infrastructure strengthen these relationships. The study contributes to posthuman accounting scholarship by empirically demonstrating how audit quality emerges from socio technical entanglements rather than from isolated human expertise, with important implications for accountability, professional responsibility, and audit governance in algorithmically mediated environments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.63332/joph.v6i2.3940

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Aunur Rozana, A. S., Winarningsih, S., & Yadiati, W. (2025). The impact of big data analytics on audit quality in the digital era. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 9(x), 368-380. (SEM-PLS study, Indonesia).
  2. Big Data Analytics in Auditing and the consequences for audit quality: A study using the technology acceptance model (TAM). (2022). Journal of Accounting and Business Research, 12(1), 1-25.
  3. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE.
  4. Ibrahim, K. (2024). Effect of artificial intelligence on the future of auditing and assurance services in Nigeria. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5085491 International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2022). Assurance in the digital age. IFAC Knowledge Gateway. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2023). 2023-2024 handbook of international quality management, auditing, review, other assurance, and related services pronouncements. IFAC. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2024a). Technology position statement: Embracing innovation in audit and assurance. IAASB. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2024b). Technology focus area. IAASB website. · DOI
  5. Khalaf, M. H. (2024). The impact of using data analytics in the audit process on the audit report lag: Evidence from Egypt. Alexandria Journal of Managerial Research & Information Systems, 7(2), 1-23.
  6. Obemeata, A. O. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence in auditing and assurance. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, 9(8), 123-131.
  7. Vardanyan, K., & Nemchenko, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence in auditing: A systematic review of tools, applications, and challenges. Journal of Digital Accounting and Assurance, 4(2), 45-72.

Authors
Akossey, S. E., Djan, E. B., Cobbinah, J., & Nsiah, E. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Africa (ZM)
  • University of Ghana (GH)
Venue
Journal of Posthumanism
Published
2026-02-02
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
17-27
ISSN
  • 2634-3576 (ISSN-L)
  • 2634-3584
OpenAlex
W7127068222
Cited by
1
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
18.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Posthumanism (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Robotic Process Automation Applications
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Financial Management
Keywords
audit data analytics, artificial intelligence in auditing, auditor judgment, audit quality, posthumanism, emerging markets, audit delay, financial restatements, regulatory support, technological infrastructure, distributed cognition, audit governance, professional responsibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review