Cited by 65Treatment of Major DepressionBipolar Disorder and TreatmentPsychological Treatments and Disorders

A Systematic Review of Augmentation Strategies for Patients with Major Depressive Disorder

Fleurence, Rachael, Williamson, Rebecca, Jing, Yonghua, Kim, Edward, Tran, Quynh-Van, Pikalov, Andrei, Thase, Michael E.·2025·Psychopharmacology Bulletin

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Clinicians need to determine the most appropriate and effective interventions for patients who do not benefit from first-line treatment. A systematic review of the literature on augmentation strategies for major depression was conducted. A total of 32 eligible studies were included in the final review. Identified augmentation strategies included lithium, thyroid hormone, buspirone, stimulant drugs (methylphenidate and modafinil), and atypical antipsychotics (olanzapine, quetiapine, aripiprazole, and risperidone). Additional studies used other augmentation strategies (yohimbine, atomoxetine, inositol, testosterone, and lamotrigine), or combinations with a second antidepressant (mianserin, mirtazapine, and desipramine). There was no evidence of clinical efficacy as measured by response in augmentation with buspirone, testosterone, methylphenidate, yohimbine, inositol, and atomoxetine. Although some studies of combined antidepressant therapy and lithium augmentation did show statistically significant clinical effects, results were inconsistent across studies. The only eligible study of thyroid augmentation was positive, though this study evaluated patients treated with tricyclic antidepressants. It is possible due to small sample sizes, that some of the trials failed to detect significant differences versus placebo because of inadequate statistical power. Adjunctive therapy with atypical antipsychotics s…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.64719/pb.4089

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fleurence, R., Williamson, R., Jing, Y., Kim, E., Tran, Q.-V., Pikalov, A., & Thase, M. E.
Venue
Psychopharmacology Bulletin
Published
2025-08-12
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
57-91
ISSN
  • 0048-5764 (ISSN-L)
  • 2472-2448
OpenAlex
W1854929367
Cited by
65
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychopharmacology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
Keywords
major depressive disorder, antidepressant augmentation, treatment-resistant depression, lithium augmentation, buspirone, methylphenidate, modafinil, atypical antipsychotics, olanzapine, quetiapine, aripiprazole, risperidone, yohimbine, atomoxetine, myo-inositol, testosterone, lamotrigine, mirtazapine, desipramine, mianserin, adverse events, tolerability
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Major Depressive Disorder, Drug Therapy, Combination, Humans, Antipsychotic Agents, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review