Cited by 14Treatment of Major DepressionBipolar Disorder and TreatmentNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate augmentation for major depressive disorder in adults with inadequate response to antidepressant therapy

Open access
Richards, Cynthia, Iosifescu, Dan V, Mago, Rajnish, Sarkis, Elias, Reynolds, James, Geibel, Brooke, Dauphin, Matthew·2017·Journal of Psychopharmacology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated dose-response relationships of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate when used as augmentation for major depressive disorder in individuals exhibiting inadequate responses to antidepressant monotherapy. METHODS: Eligible adults (18-65 years) were assigned to antidepressant monotherapy (escitalopram or venlafaxine extended-release) plus lisdexamfetamine dimesylate-matching placebo during an eight-week single-blind lead-in phase. Participants meeting randomization criteria were randomized (1:1:1:1:1) to eight weeks of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (10, 30, 50, or 70 mg) or placebo while maintaining antidepressant therapy. Dose-responses for changes from augmentation baseline to week 16/early termination for Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score (primary efficacy endpoint) and vital signs (systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse) were assessed using multiple comparisons procedures with modeling. RESULTS: For Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score change, no significant dose-responses were observed for any candidate dose-response curve (all p>0.10). In the dose-response evaluable population, least squares mean (90% confidence interval) treatment differences versus placebo for Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score change at week 16 were -1.4 (-3.9, 1.2), 0.1 (-2.5, 2.7), -0.7 (-3.4, 2.0), and -0.9 (-3.5, 1.6) with 10, 30, 50, and 70 mg lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, respectively. For all vital sign parameters, lisdexamfetamine dimesylate exhibited significant dose-responses for all candidate dose-response curves (all p<0.10), with increases observed as lisdexamfetamine dimesylate dose increased; a linear relationship provided the best fit. Mean±standard deviation changes from augmentation baseline for systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse at week 16/early termination were -0.7±9.90 and -0.3±7.24 mm Hg and 0.2±10.57 bpm with placebo and were 1.9±9.47 and 0.8±7.40 mm Hg and 3.6±9.74 bpm with lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (all doses combined). The safety and tolerability profile of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate was consistent with previous studies. CONCLUSIONS: Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate augmentation did not provide benefit over placebo in adults with inadequate responses to antidepressant monotherapy based on the assessed efficacy measures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269881117722998

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Fleurence R, 2009, Psychopharmacol Bull, 42, 57
  2. Vyvanse® Product Monograph, 2016, lisdexamfetamine dimesylate capsules

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richards, C., Iosifescu, D. V., Mago, R., Sarkis, E., Reynolds, J., Geibel, B., & Dauphin, M.
Affiliations
  • Formerly of Shire, Lexington, USA
  • New York University (US)
  • Private Practice, Philadelphia, USA
  • Sarkis Family Psychiatry, Gainesville, USA
Corresponding author
Reynolds, James
Venue
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Published
2017-08-31
Volume
31
Issue
9
Pages
1190-1203
ISSN
  • 0269-8811 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7285
OpenAlex
W2751865667
Cited by
14
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, major depressive disorder, antidepressant augmentation, treatment-resistant depression, dose-response relationship, escitalopram, venlafaxine extended release, vital signs, blood pressure, heart rate, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, adverse events, stimulants, children and adolescents
MeSH terms
Venlafaxine Hydrochloride, Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate, Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Blood Pressure, Major Depressive Disorder, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Citalopram

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review