STEMing the Shock: Examining Transfer Shock and Its Impact on STEM Major and Enrollment Persistence
Abstract
Students who transfer between institutions of higher education often experience transfer shock , a temporary decrease in academic performance (GPA) hypothesized to be due to changes in academic expectations between institutions. This study used university institutional records to explore the magnitude of transfer shock; the factors contributing to the GPA effects of transfer shock; and the impact of shock and other student characteristics on important academic outcomes, including persistence in a STEM major and baccalaureate degree. We found that STEM majors and students transferring from two-year institutions experienced the largest degree of transfer shock and that shock was a significant predictor of change of major. Most intriguingly, we found interaction effects where shock had a greater impact on institutional retention for two-year transfers and science or mathematics majors. Implications for future research and academic policies and interventions are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Transfer students in STEM majors may experience greater transfer shock than transfer students in other majors.
“Transfer students in STEM majors may experience greater transfer shock than transfer students in other majors (Lakin and Elliott, 2016)”
From A Meta-analysis of University STEM Summer Bridge Program Effectiveness (2021) · cites this paper as Lakin and Elliott, 2016
Cites
Do Psychosocial and Study Skill Factors Predict College Outcomes? A Meta-Analysis.
Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.261 · Cited by 2,479 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Meta-analysis of University STEM Summer Bridge Program Effectiveness
Bradford, B. C., Beier, M. E., & Oswald, F. L. (2021) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.20-03-0046 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lakin, J. M., & Elliott, D. C.
- ORCID
- Lakin, Joni M.
- Venue
- Journal of The First-Year Experience & Students in Transition
- Published
- 2016-11-11
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 9-31
- ISSN
- 1053-203X (ISSN-L)
- 1542-3077
- OpenAlex
- W2993692973
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of The First-Year Experience & Students in Transition (publishedVersion)
- Journal of The First-Year Experience & Students in Transition
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Military Integration
- Keywords
- transfer shock, student transfer, STEM majors, academic performance, grade point average, first-year students, academic expectations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review