Cited by 2Lower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesHip disorders and treatmentsErgonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders

Hip Flexion Angles During Supine Range of Motion and Bodyweight Squats

Open access
Angeli J Mata, Hidetaka Hayashi, Phillip A Moreno, Robert I. Dudley, Eric A. Sorenson·2021·International Journal of Exercise Science

Abstract

During the lowering phase of a squat, it has been observed that a posterior pelvic tilt (PPT) may occur when squatting to full depth. Research suggests that defaulting to compensatory movement strategies, such as PPT, during the squat may correlate with risk of lower extremity and trunk pathology. The purpose of this study was to examine hip flexion (HF) angles at the point when PPT occurs among three conditions: standard squats, heel raise squats, and supine passive HF; analyzing the differences in depth between standard and heel raise squats; and calculating differences in knee angles and ankle excursion between standard and heel raise squats. 28 participants performed bodyweight squats and underwent supine passive HF while outfitted with 32 retroreflective motion capture markers. Hip, knee, and ankle joint angles were extracted at the point of PPT. A one-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine differences in hip joint angles between conditions, and a paired sample t-test was used to compare knee angles, ankle excursion, and squat depth between standard and heel raise squats. HF angles at PPT remained unchanged across all conditions. However, significantly greater knee flexion, ankle excursion, and squat depth were observed in the heel raise squats compared to the standard squats. Results suggest that PPT is a compensatory movement that occurs as the femur compresses into the acetabulum once hip flexion has been exhausted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.70252/lmeg8374

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The knee flexion moment tends to steadily increase from an upright position to maximum knee flexion during squatting.

    “Generally speaking, the knee flexion moment tends to steadily increase from an upright position to maximum knee flexion during squatting.30–32”
  • Deeper squats increase quadriceps demands (moments).

    “Secondary considerations for the introduction of more knee bias squatting include the use of deeper squats to increase quadriceps demands (moments)30,32 and narrow/medium stance widths.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mata, A. J., Hayashi, H., Moreno, P. A., Dudley, R. I., & Sorenson, E. A.
Affiliations
Azusa Pacific University (US)
Venue
International Journal of Exercise Science
Published
2021
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
912-918
ISSN
1939-795X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3180139480
Cited by
2
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nd
Locations
  • International journal of exercise science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TopSCHOLAR (Western Kentucky University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip disorders and treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Keywords
hip flexion angle, posterior pelvic tilt, squat depth, knee flexion, compensatory movement strategies, lower extremity injury risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review