The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Advances in Swine Biomedical Model Genomics
Open accessAbstract
This review is a short update on the diversity of swine biomedical models and the importance of genomics in their continued development. The swine has been used as a major mammalian model for human studies because of the similarity in size and physiology, and in organ development and disease progression. The pig model allows for deliberately timed studies, imaging of internal vessels and organs using standard human technologies, and collection of repeated peripheral samples and, at kill, detailed mucosal tissues. The ability to use pigs from the same litter, or cloned or transgenic pigs, facilitates comparative analyses and genetic mapping. The availability of numerous well defined cell lines, representing a broad range of tissues, further facilitates testing of gene expression, drug susceptibility, etc. Thus the pig is an excellent biomedical model for humans. For genomic applications it is an asset that the pig genome has high sequence and chromosome structure homology with humans. With the swine genome sequence now well advanced there are improving genetic and proteomic tools for these comparative analyses. The review will discuss some of the genomic approaches used to probe these models. The review will highlight genomic studies of melanoma and of infectious disease resistance, discussing issues to consider in designing such studies. It will end with a short discussion of the potential for genomic approaches to develop new alternatives for control of the most economically important disease of pigs, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS), and the potential for applying knowledge gained with this virus for human viral infectious disease studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The pig as an animal model for human pathologies: A proteomics perspective
Bassols, A., Costa, C., Eckersall, P. D., Osada, J., Sabrià, J., & Tibau, J. (2014) · PROTEOMICS – Clinical Applications · doi:10.1002/prca.201300099 · Cited by 254
Health‐beneficial effects of probiotics: Its mode of action
OHASHI, Y., & USHIDA, K. (2009) · Animal Science Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1740-0929.2009.00645.x · Cited by 209
Large animal models of cardiovascular disease
Tsang, H. G., Rashdan, N. A., Whitelaw, C. B. A., Corcoran, B. M., Summers, K. M., & MacRae, V. E. (2016) · Cell Biochemistry and Function · doi:10.1002/cbf.3173 · Cited by 154
Szczerbal, I., Foster, H. A., & Bridger, J. M. (2009) · Chromosoma · doi:10.1007/s00412-009-0225-5 · Cited by 107
Tanihara, F., Hirata, M., Nguyen, N. T., Le, Q. A., Hirano, T., Takemoto, T., Nakai, M., Fuchimoto, D.-I., & Otoi, T. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0206360 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Lunney, J. K.
- Venue
- International Journal of Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- Ivyspring International Publisher
- Published
- 2007
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 179-184
- ISSN
- 1449-2288 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2100373655
- Cited by
- 513
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advances in Swine Biomedical Model Genomics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7150/ijbs.3.179
- The paper
- Lunney, J. K. (2007). Advances in Swine Biomedical Model Genomics. International Journal of Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.3.179
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.