Cited by 102Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases

Comparison between single antiplatelet therapy and combination of antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy for secondary prevention in ischemic stroke patients with antiphospholipid syndrome

Open access
Okuma, Hirohisa, Kitagawa, Yasuhisa, Yasuda, Takashi, Tokuoka, Kentaro, Takagi, Shigeharu·2010·International Journal of Medical Sciences

Abstract

Satisfactory results have not yet been obtained in therapy for secondary prevention in ischemic stroke patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). We therefore compared single antiplatelet therapy and a combination of antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy for secondary prevention in ischemic stroke patients with APS.The subjects were 20 ischemic stroke patients with antiphospholipid antibody, 13 with primary antiphospholipid syndrome and 7 with SLE-related antiphospholipid syndrome. Diagnosis of APS was based on the 2006 Sydney criteria. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to either single antiplatelet therapy (aspirin 100 mg) or a combination of antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy (target INR: 2.0-3.0; mean 2.4+/-0.3) for the secondary prevention of stroke according to a double-blind protocol. There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, gender, NIH Stroke Scale on admission, mRS at discharge, or rate of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, or cardiac disease. We obtained Kaplan-Meier survival curves for each treatment. The primary outcome was the occurrence of stroke. The mean follow-up time was 3.9+/-2.0 years. The cumulative incidence of stroke in patients with single antiplatelet treatment was statistically significantly higher than that in patients receiving the combination of antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy (log-rank test, p-value=0.026). The incidence of hemorrhagic complications was similar in the two groups. The recent APASS study did not show any difference in effectiveness for secondary prevention between single antiplatelet (aspirin) and single anticoagulant (warfarin) therapy. Our results indicate that combination therapy may be more effective in APS-related ischemic stroke.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7150/ijms.7.15

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Treatment with vitamin K antagonist target INR 2-3 plus low-dose aspirin in antiphospholipid syndrome with first arterial thrombosis is supported by limited data from one retrospective cohort study and one small RCT.

    “Alternatively, treatment with VKA with a target INR of 2–3 plus LDA is used by some experts, supported by limited data from one retrospective cohort study and one small RCT.36 37”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. [1]Harris EN Gharavi AE Boey ML Anticardiolipin antibodies: detection by radioimmunoassay and association with thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus Lancet 1983 2 1211 4 6139567
  2. [2]Kitagawa Y Antiphospholipid antibodies syndrome and ischemic stroke Annual Review 2004 1 139 51
  3. [4]Greaves M Cohen H MacHi SJ Guidelines on the investigation and management of the antiphospholipid syndrome Br J Haematol 2000 109 704 15 10929019
  4. [6]Jacobs BS Levine SR Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome Cure Treat Options Neurol 2000 2 449 58 11096770
  5. [7]Crowther MA Ginsberg JS Julian J A comparison of two intensities of warfarin for the prevention of recurrent thrombosis in patients with the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome N Eng J Med 2003 349 1133 8 13679527
  6. [8]Finazzi G Marchioli R Brancaccio V A randomized clinical trial of high-intensity warfarin vs. conventional antithrombotic therapy for the prevention of recurrent thrombosis in patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome (WAPS) J Thromb Haemost 2005 3 848 53 15869575
  7. [9]Wittkowsky AK Downing J Blackburn J Warfarin-related outcome in patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome managed in an anticoagulation clinic Throb Haemost 2006 96 137 41 16894455
  8. [10]Erkan D Lockshin MD New approaches for managing antiphospholipid syndrome Nat Clin Pract Rheumathol 2009 5 160 70 19252521
  9. [11]Okuma H Kitagawa Y Takagi S Prevalence rates of antiphospholipid antibodies in ischemic stroke patients. Intern Med 2006 45 1017 8 17016003
  10. [12]Diz-Kucukkaya R Hancer VS Artin-Esen B The prevalence and clinical significance of inherited thrombophilic risk factors in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome J Thromb Thrombolysis 2009 6 356 9 19504051
  11. [13]Brey RL Management of the neurological manifestations of APS - what do the trials tell us? Thrombosis Research 2004 114 489 99 15507283
  12. [14]Khamashta MA Cuadrado MJ Mujic F The management of thrombosis in the antiphospholipid-antibody syndrome N Eng J Med 1995 332 993 7 7885428
  13. [15]Derksen RH Groot PG Kappelle LJ Low dose aspirin after ischemic stroke associated with antiphospholipid syndrome Neurology 2003 61 111 4 12847169
  14. [16]Wahl D Membre A Perret-Guillaume C Mechanisms of antiphospholipid-induced thrombosis: effects on the protein C system Curr Rheumatol Rep 2009 11 77 81 19171115
  15. [17]Li TH Chen TH Lin HS Uncoupling of protein C and antithrombin Ш activitiy in cerebral ischemia patients with cutis marmorata Acta Neurol Taiwan 2008 17 233 8 19280866

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Okuma, H., Kitagawa, Y., Yasuda, T., Tokuoka, K., & Takagi, S.
Affiliations
  • Tokai University Tokyo Hospital (JP)
  • Tokai University Hachioji Hospital (JP)
  • Tokai University (JP)
Corresponding author
Okuma, Hirohisa
Venue
International Journal of Medical Sciences
Published
2010
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
15-18
ISSN
1449-1907 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133740664
Cited by
102
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • International Journal of Medical Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
Keywords
antiphospholipid syndrome, ischemic stroke, secondary stroke prevention, antiplatelet therapy, aspirin, anticoagulation, warfarin, combination therapy, systemic lupus erythematosus, bleeding complications, antiphospholipid antibodies
MeSH terms
Anticoagulants, Aspirin, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors, Warfarin, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Stroke, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review