Cited by 56Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsVasculitis and related conditions

Patients with antiphosholipid syndrome and thrombotic recurrences: A real world observation (the Piedmont cohort study)

Open access
Bazzan, M, Vaccarino, A, Stella, S, Sciascia, S, Montaruli, B, Bertero, M T, Carignola, R, Roccatello, D +1 more·2016·Lupus

Abstract

Background: Patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) often have thrombotic recurrences, sometimes despite appropriate ongoing anticoagulant treatment. Identifying APS vascular patients at high risk for thrombotic recurrences is still an unsolved issue. Objectives: To report the real-life experience of thrombotic recurrences in APS patients included in the Piedmont observational cohort study, and evaluate clinical and laboratory risk factors for thrombotic recurrences. Patients: A multi-centre observational study was performed by enrolling 177 patients with vascular APS (primary APS in 99 subjects (56%)); the median follow-up was five years (range 1–26 years). Results: The observed thrombotic recurrence rate was about 7.5/100 patient years in the first five years after the first thrombotic event. While the first recurrence often occurred (45%) in patients who were not on oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT), the second recurrence mainly occurred despite ongoing OAT (80%). However, due to the real-life observational nature of this study, treatment was based on the treating physician’s judgement, and no structured therapeutic protocol was applied. Moreover, compliance with OAT was not available. No differences in antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) profile were observed between patients with or without thrombotic recurrences, but a high risk aPL profile (Miyakis type 1 and 2a) was present in 96% of our patients, 26% of whom had triple positivity. Diabetes ( p < 0.01, OR 10), inherited thrombophilia ( p < 0.0078, OR 4) and OAT withdrawal were independent risk factors for recurrences. Conclusions: With the limit of a real-life observational cohort study, the thrombotic recurrence rate in APS was as high as 7.5/100 patient years in the first five years after the first thrombotic event. OAT discontinuation, diabetes and inherited thrombophilia, when associated with a high-risk aPL profile, are risk factors for thrombotic recurrences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0961203315617538

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 10-year cumulative TE incidence of 24.3% compares well to the thrombotic risk observed in the WAPS study and the Euro-Phospholipid Project registry, but was lower than the value in the Piedmont cohort study and higher than that in the study by Pengo et al.

    “The 10-year cumulative TE incidence of 24.3% compares well to the thrombotic risk observed in the WAPS study [31] and the very large Euro-Phospholipid Project registry [6], but was lower than the value in the recently published Piedmont cohort study [32] and higher than that in the recently published study by Pengo et al. [30].”
  • While triple positivity has been shown to be a significant thrombotic risk factor in the WAPS study, several more recent prospective cohorts have also observed a lack of association between triple positivity or other LA-related autoantibodies and thrombosis.

    “While triple positivity has been shown to be a significant thrombotic risk factor in the WAPS study [7], several more recent prospective cohorts have also observed a lack of association between triple positivity or other LA-related autoantibodies and thrombosis [30, 32, 33].”
  • The recently published results from the Piedmont cohort study found a tenfold increased thrombotic risk in LA patients with diabetes.

    “This is consistent with the recently published results from the Piedmont cohort study, which found a tenfold increased thrombotic risk in LA patients with diabetes [32].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bazzan, M., Vaccarino, A., Stella, S., Sciascia, S., Montaruli, B., Bertero, M. T., Carignola, R., Roccatello, D., & for the Piedmont APS Consortium
Affiliations
  • Ospedale San Giovanni Bosco (IT)
  • Haemostasis Laboratory, Umberto I Hospital, Torino, Italy
  • Clinical Immunology, Umberto I Hospital, Torino, Italy
  • Ospedale San Luigi Gonzaga (IT)
Venue
Lupus
Published
2015-12-08
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
479-485
ISSN
  • 0961-2033 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0962
OpenAlex
W2391816831
Cited by
56
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lupus (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vasculitis and related conditions
Keywords
antiphospholipid syndrome, oral anticoagulation, antiphospholipid antibodies, risk factors, diabetes mellitus, inherited thrombophilia, anticoagulant withdrawal, primary antiphospholipid syndrome, recurrence rate
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anticoagulants, Female, Humans, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Thrombosis, Time Factors, Biomarkers, Incidence, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Antiphospholipid Syndrome, Treatment Outcome, Antibodies, Antiphospholipid, Risk Assessment, Thrombophilia, Diabetes Complications, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review