Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 190

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Safety of panitumumab-IRDye800CW and cetuximab-IRDye800CW for fluorescence-guided surgical navigation in head and neck cancers

Open access
Gao, Rebecca W., Teraphongphom, Nutte, de Boer, Esther, Berg, Nynke S. van den, Divi, Vasu, Kaplan, Michael J., Oberhelman, Nicholas J., Hong, Steven S., Capes, Elissa, Colevas, A. Dimitrios, Warram, Jason M., Rosenthal, Eben L.·2018·Theranostics

Abstract

Purpose: To demonstrate the safety and feasibility of leveraging therapeutic antibodies for surgical imaging.Procedures: We conducted two phase I trials for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies cetuximab-IRDye800CW (n=12) and panitumumab-IRDye800CW (n=15).Adults with biopsy-confirmed head and neck squamous cell carcinoma scheduled for standard-of-care surgery were eligible.For cetuximab-IRDye800CW, cohort 1 was intravenously infused with 2.5 mg/m 2 , cohort 2 received 25 mg/m 2 , and cohort 3 received 62.5 mg/m 2 .For panitumumab-IRDye800CW, cohorts received 0.06 mg/kg, 0.5 mg/kg, and 1 mg/kg, respectively.Electrocardiograms and blood samples were obtained, and patients were followed for 30 days post-study drug infusion.Results: Both fluorescently labeled antibodies had similar pharmacodynamic properties and minimal toxicities.Two infusion reactions occurred with cetuximab and none with panitumumab.There were no grade 2 or higher toxicities attributable to cetuximab-IRDye800CW or panitumumab-IRDye800CW; fifteen grade 1 adverse events occurred with cetuximab-I RDye800CW, and one grade 1 occurred with panitumumab-IRDye800CW.There were no significant differences in QTc prolongation between the two trials (p=0.8).Conclusions: Panitumumab-IRDye800CW and cetuximab-IRDye800CW have toxicity and pharmacodynamic profiles that match the parent compound, suggesting that other therapeutic antibodies may be repurposed as imaging agents with limited preclinical toxicology data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7150/thno.24487

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 190

Metadata

Authors
Gao, R. W., Teraphongphom, N., de Boer, E., Berg, N. S. V. D., Divi, V., Kaplan, M. J., Oberhelman, N. J., Hong, S. S., Capes, E., Colevas, A. D., Warram, J. M., & Rosenthal, E. L.
Venue
Theranostics
Published
2018
Volume
8
Issue
9
Pages
2488-2495
ISSN
1838-7640 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2802536159
Cited by
190
References
2
FWCI
12.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Safety of panitumumab-IRDye800CW and cetuximab-IRDye800CW for fluorescence-guided surgical navigation in head and neck cancers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7150/thno.24487
The paper
Gao, R. W., Teraphongphom, N., de Boer, E., Berg, N. S. V. D., Divi, V., Kaplan, M. J., Oberhelman, N. J., Hong, S. S., Capes, E., Colevas, A. D., Warram, J. M., & Rosenthal, E. L. (2018). Safety of panitumumab-IRDye800CW and cetuximab-IRDye800CW for fluorescence-guided surgical navigation in head and neck cancers. Theranostics. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.24487

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.