The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Safety of panitumumab-IRDye800CW and cetuximab-IRDye800CW for fluorescence-guided surgical navigation in head and neck cancers
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: To demonstrate the safety and feasibility of leveraging therapeutic antibodies for surgical imaging.Procedures: We conducted two phase I trials for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies cetuximab-IRDye800CW (n=12) and panitumumab-IRDye800CW (n=15).Adults with biopsy-confirmed head and neck squamous cell carcinoma scheduled for standard-of-care surgery were eligible.For cetuximab-IRDye800CW, cohort 1 was intravenously infused with 2.5 mg/m 2 , cohort 2 received 25 mg/m 2 , and cohort 3 received 62.5 mg/m 2 .For panitumumab-IRDye800CW, cohorts received 0.06 mg/kg, 0.5 mg/kg, and 1 mg/kg, respectively.Electrocardiograms and blood samples were obtained, and patients were followed for 30 days post-study drug infusion.Results: Both fluorescently labeled antibodies had similar pharmacodynamic properties and minimal toxicities.Two infusion reactions occurred with cetuximab and none with panitumumab.There were no grade 2 or higher toxicities attributable to cetuximab-IRDye800CW or panitumumab-IRDye800CW; fifteen grade 1 adverse events occurred with cetuximab-I RDye800CW, and one grade 1 occurred with panitumumab-IRDye800CW.There were no significant differences in QTc prolongation between the two trials (p=0.8).Conclusions: Panitumumab-IRDye800CW and cetuximab-IRDye800CW have toxicity and pharmacodynamic profiles that match the parent compound, suggesting that other therapeutic antibodies may be repurposed as imaging agents with limited preclinical toxicology data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stummer, W., Pichlmeier, U., Meinel, T., Wiestler, O. D., Zanella, F., & Reulen, H.-J. (2006) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(06)70665-9 · Cited by 3,423
Price, T. J., Peeters, M., Kim, T. W., Li, J., Cascinu, S., Ruff, P., Suresh, A. S., Thomas, A., Tjulandin, S., Zhang, K., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70118-4 · Cited by 473
Cited by
Deep learning for in vivo near-infrared imaging
Ma, Z., Wang, F., Wang, W., Zhong, Y., & Dai, H. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2021446118 · Cited by 135
Tian, Y., Chen, Z., Liu, S., Wu, F., Cao, W., Pang, D., & Xiong, H. (2023) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202309768 · Cited by 57
Mc Larney, B. E., Sonay, A. Y., Apfelbaum, E., Mostafa, N., Monette, S., Goerzen, D., Aguirre, N., Exner, R. M., Habjan, C., Isaac, E., et al. (2024) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-024-01248-w · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Gao, R. W., Teraphongphom, N., de Boer, E., Berg, N. S. V. D., Divi, V., Kaplan, M. J., Oberhelman, N. J., Hong, S. S., Capes, E., Colevas, A. D., Warram, J. M., & Rosenthal, E. L.
- Venue
- Theranostics
- Publisher
- Ivyspring International Publisher
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2488-2495
- ISSN
- 1838-7640 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2802536159
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Safety of panitumumab-IRDye800CW and cetuximab-IRDye800CW for fluorescence-guided surgical navigation in head and neck cancers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7150/thno.24487
- The paper
- Gao, R. W., Teraphongphom, N., de Boer, E., Berg, N. S. V. D., Divi, V., Kaplan, M. J., Oberhelman, N. J., Hong, S. S., Capes, E., Colevas, A. D., Warram, J. M., & Rosenthal, E. L. (2018). Safety of panitumumab-IRDye800CW and cetuximab-IRDye800CW for fluorescence-guided surgical navigation in head and neck cancers. Theranostics. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.24487
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.