Cited by 135Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical ResearchAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques

Deep learning for in vivo near-infrared imaging

Open access
Ma, Zhuoran, Wang, Feifei, Wang, Weizhi, Zhong, Yeteng, Dai, Hongjie·2021·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging using biocompatible dyes such as ICG in the NIR-I (800–1,000 nm) has facilitated tumor imaging and imaging-guided surgery, but suffers from shallow imaging depth, low contrast, and poor clarity caused by light scattering and autofluorescence. On the other hand, fluorescence imaging in NIR-IIb (1,500–1,700 nm) affords much improved spatial resolution and deeper tissue penetration, but currently relies on fluorophores not approved for human use. This work presents a deep-learning–based approach to transform a blurred NIR-I image to a much higher-clarity image like in NIR-IIb, leading to an image closely resembling the ground truth. The deep-learning–enabled high-resolution NIR imaging could facilitate basic biomedical research and empower diagnostics and imaging-guided surgery in the clinic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2021446118

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ma, Z., Wang, F., Wang, W., Zhong, Y., & Dai, H.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Dai, Hongjie
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2020-12-28
Volume
118
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W3115300508
Cited by
135
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 9
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
HHS | National Institutes of Health (DP1-NS-105737)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
Keywords
NIR-II fluorescence imaging, indocyanine green, lymph node imaging, PD-L1, EGFR, light-sheet microscopy, light scattering, small-molecule fluorescent probes, image-guided surgery
MeSH terms
Cetuximab, Intravital Microscopy, Deep Learning, Animals, Fluorescent Dyes, Humans, Indocyanine Green, Indoles, Lymph Nodes, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Nude, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Neoplasms, Neural Networks, Computer, Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice, Molecular Imaging, Signal-To-Noise Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review