Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Non-invasive diagnosis of early-stage lung cancer using high-throughput targeted DNA methylation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)

Open access
Liang, Wenhua, Zhao, Yue, Huang, Weizhe, Gao, Yangbin, Xu, Weihong, Tao, Jinsheng, Yang, Meng, Li, Lequn, Ping, Wei, Shen, Hui, Fu, Xiangning, Chen, Zhiwei, Laird, Peter W., Cai, Xuyu, Fan, Jian-Bing, He, Jianxing·2019·Theranostics

Abstract

Rational: LDCT screening can identify early-stage lung cancers yet introduces excessive false positives and it remains a great challenge to differentiate malignant tumors from benign solitary pulmonary nodules, which calls for better non-invasive diagnostic tools.Methods: We performed DNA methylation profiling by high throughput DNA bisulfite sequencing in tissue samples (nodule size < 3 cm in diameter) to learn methylation patterns that differentiate cancerous tumors from benign lesions.Then we filtered out methylation patterns exhibiting high background in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and built an assay for plasma sample classification.Results: We first performed methylation profiling of 230 tissue samples to learn cancer-specific methylation patterns which achieved a sensitivity of 92.7% (88.3% -97.1%) and a specificity of 92.8% (89.3% -96.3%).These tissue-derived DNA methylation markers were further filtered using a training set of 66 plasma samples and 9 markers were selected to build a diagnostic prediction model.From an independent validation set of additional 66 plasma samples, this model obtained a sensitivity of 79.5% (63.5% -90.7%) and a specificity of 85.2% (66.3% -95.8%) for differentiating patients with malignant tumor (n = 39) from patients with benign lesions (n = 27).Additionally, when tested on gender and age matched asymptomatic normal individuals (n = 118), our model achieved a specificity of 93.2% (89.0%-98.3%).Specifically, our assay is highly sensitive towards early-stage lung cancer, with a sensitivity of 75.0%(55.0%-90.0%) in 20 stage Ia lung cancer patients and 85.7% (57.1%-100.0%) in 7 stage Ib lung cancer patients.Conclusions: We have developed a novel sensitive blood based non-invasive diagnostic assay for detecting early stage lung cancer as well as differentiating lung cancers from benign pulmonary nodules.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7150/thno.28119

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Liang, W., Zhao, Y., Huang, W., Gao, Y., Xu, W., Tao, J., Yang, M., Li, L., Ping, W., Shen, H., Fu, X., Chen, Z., Laird, P. W., Cai, X., Fan, J.-B., & He, J.
Venue
Theranostics
Published
2019
Volume
9
Issue
7
Pages
2056-2070
ISSN
1838-7640 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2937196653
Cited by
265
References
8
FWCI
8.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Non-invasive diagnosis of early-stage lung cancer using high-throughput targeted DNA methylation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.7150/thno.28119
The paper
Liang, W., Zhao, Y., Huang, W., Gao, Y., Xu, W., Tao, J., Yang, M., Li, L., Ping, W., Shen, H., Fu, X., Chen, Z., Laird, P. W., Cai, X., Fan, J.-B., & He, J. (2019). Non-invasive diagnosis of early-stage lung cancer using high-throughput targeted DNA methylation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Theranostics. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.28119

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.