The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Magnetic Nanoparticles and microNMR for Diagnostic Applications
Open accessAbstract
Sensitive and quantitative measurements of clinically relevant protein biomarkers, pathogens and cells in biological samples would be invaluable for disease diagnosis, monitoring of malignancy, and for evaluating therapy efficacy. Biosensing strategies using magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) have recently received considerable attention, since they offer unique advantages over traditional detection methods. Specifically, because biological samples have negligible magnetic background, MNPs can be used to obtain highly sensitive measurements in minimally processed samples. This review focuses on the use of MNPs for in vitro detection of cellular biomarkers based on nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) effects. This detection platform, termed diagnostic magnetic resonance (DMR), exploits MNPs as proximity sensors to modulate the spin-spin relaxation time of water molecules surrounding the molecularly-targeted nanoparticles. With new developments such as more effective MNP biosensors, advanced conjugational strategies, and highly sensitive miniaturized NMR systems, the DMR detection capabilities have been considerably improved. These developments have also enabled parallel and rapid measurements from small sample volumes and on a wide range of targets, including whole cells, proteins, DNA/mRNA, metabolites, drugs, viruses and bacteria. The DMR platform thus makes a robust and easy-to-use sensor system with broad applications in biomedicine, as well as clinical utility in point-of-care settings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Label-free immunodetection with CMOS-compatible semiconducting nanowires
Stern, E., Klemic, J. F., Routenberg, D. A., Wyrembak, P. N., Turner-Evans, D. B., Hamilton, A. D., LaVan, D. A., Fahmy, T. M., & Reed, M. A. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05498 · Cited by 1,352
Perez, J. M., O'Loughin, T., Simeone, F. J., Weissleder, R., & Josephson, L. (2002) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja017773n · Cited by 355
Self-citation
Cited by
Current methods for the isolation of extracellular vesicles
Momen-Heravi, F., Balaj, L., Alian, S., Mantel, P.-Y., Halleck, A. E., Trachtenberg, A. J., Soria, C. E., Oquin, S., Bonebreak, C. M., Saracoglu, E., et al. (2013) · bchm · doi:10.1515/hsz-2013-0141 · Cited by 578
Point-of-care microfluidic devices for pathogen detection
Nasseri, B., Soleimani, N., Rabiee, N., Kalbasi, A., Karimi, M., & Hamblin, M. R. (2018) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2018.05.050 · Cited by 382
Hayashi, K., Nakamura, M., Sakamoto, W., Yogo, T., Miki, H., Ozaki, S., Abe, M., Matsumoto, T., & Ishimura, K. (2013) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.5860 · Cited by 329
Recent Developments in Magnetic Diagnostic Systems
Lee, H., Shin, T.-H., Cheon, J., & Weissleder, R. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500698d · Cited by 292
Self-citationMagnetic nanoparticles: a novel platform for cancer theranostics
Singh, A., & Sahoo, S. K. (2014) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2013.10.005 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Shao, H., Min, C., Issadore, D., Liong, M., Yoon, T.-J., Weissleder, R., & Lee, H.
- Venue
- Theranostics
- Publisher
- Ivyspring International Publisher
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-65
- ISSN
- 1838-7640 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2157139123
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.