Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,703

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development

Open access
·2019

Abstract

Whereas, building construction involves several professionals, tradesmen, unskilled labour and use of various equipment and materials, in unpredictable climates, risk management remains an integral part of any successful construction project. To mitigate the occurrence of risks on construction sites, builder’s risk insurance policies are statutorily provided for construction processes. The study, therefore, aimed at assessing construction professionals’ compliance to the compulsory builder’s risk insurance in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. Data were primarily collected using a questionnaire. Respondents were selected based on their direct involvement in the delivery of construction projects in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. The study adopted a random/probability sampling technique and involved two hundred and fifty-two (252) respondents that consisted of 69 Architects, 38 Builders, 47 Quantity Surveyors and 98 Engineers. From the results obtained, it was concluded that construction professionals are highly aware of the builder’s risk insurance, but their levels of compliance to the builder’s risk insurance is moderate. The implication of these findings is that the building construction industry might continue to experience losses accruing from not maximizing the builder’s risk insurance. Thus, ensuring a high level of compliance to the builder’s risk insurance policy in building construction projects will help mitigate potential losses and disputes on construction sites, and avoid time and cost overruns.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7176/jesd

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Published
2019-01-06
OpenAlex
W4210470468
Cited by
1,703
References
0
Type
paratext
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.