Cited by 72Health and Conflict StudiesGlobal Health Workforce IssuesDisaster Response and Management

Community health workers in humanitarian settings: Scoping review

Open access
Miller, Nathan P, Ardestani, Farid Bagheri, Dini, Hannah Sarah, Shafique, Fouzia, Zunong, Nureyan·2020·Journal of Global Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a need for greater understanding of experiences implementing community-based primary health care in humanitarian settings and of the adjustments needed to ensure continuation of essential services and utilization of services by the population, and to contribute to effective emergency response. We reviewed the evidence base on community health workers (CHWs) in humanitarian settings, with the goal of improving delivery of essential services to the most vulnerable populations. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of published and grey literature related to health and nutrition services provided by CHWs in humanitarian settings. Extracted data from retained documents were analyzed inductively for key themes. RESULTS: Of 3709 documents screened, 219 were included in the review. Key findings from the literature include: 1) CHWs were often able to continue providing services during acute and protracted crises, including prolonged periods of conflict and insecurity and during population displacement. 2) CHWs carried out critical emergency response activities during acute crises. 3) Flexible funding facilitated transitions between development and humanitarian programming. 4) Communities that did not have a locally-resident CHW experienced reduced access to services when travel was limited. 5) Community selection of CHWs and engagement of respected local leaders were crucial for community trust and acceptance and high utilization of services. 6) Selection of local supervisors and use of mobile phones facilitated continued supervision. 7) Actions taken to maintain supplies included creating parallel supply chains, providing buffer stocks to CHWs, and storing commodities in decentralized locations. 8) When travel was restricted, reporting and data collection were continued using mobile phones and use of local data collectors. 9) CHWs and supervisors faced security threats and psychological trauma as a result of their work. CONCLUSIONS: To achieve impact, policy makers and program implementers will have to address the bottlenecks to CHW service delivery common in stable low-income settings as well as the additional challenges unique to humanitarian settings. Future interventions should take into account the lessons learned from years of experience with implementation of community-based primary health care in humanitarian settings. There is also a need for rigorous assessments of community-based primary health care interventions in humanitarian settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7189/jogh.10.020602

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [20]Plucinski M Guilavogui T Sidikiba S Diakite N Diakite S Dioubate M Ebola epidemic impedes malaria care delivery in Guinea. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015; 93: 581- 2.
  2. [78]CBHFA Asia Pacific Workshop - Lessons Learnt and Monitoring and Evaluation. Bangkok: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, 2010.
  3. [82]Lim AG, Oo EKS. Vicarious traumatization and resilience of health workers. In: Allden K, Murakami N, editors. Trauma and recovery on war's border: A guide for global health workers. Lebanon, NH: Dartmouth College Press; 2015. p. 219-41.
  4. [86]Campbell F Shafique M Sansom P Responding to Cyclone Nargis: key lessons from Merlin’s experience. Humanitarian Practice Network. 2008; 41: 13- 6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, N. P., Ardestani, F. B., Dini, H. S., Shafique, F., & Zunong, N.
Affiliations
  • United Nations Children's Fund (US)
  • United Nations (US)
Venue
Journal of Global Health
Published
2020-12
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
020602-020602
ISSN
  • 2047-2978 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-2986
OpenAlex
W3112893153
Cited by
72
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Global Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • United States Agency for International Development
  • UNICEF
  • Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Conflict Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
Keywords
community health workers, humanitarian settings, community-based primary care, emergency response, protracted crises, armed conflict, population displacement, essential health services, nutrition services, mobile phone data collection, supply chain resilience, safety stock, community trust, local leaders, psychological trauma, service utilization
MeSH terms
Community Health Workers, Community Health Services, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Poverty, Primary Health Care, Relief Work, Vulnerable Populations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review