Cited by 7Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsClinical practice guidelines implementationAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

Evidence-based decision-making for primary care: the interpretation and role of pragmatic trials

Open access
Fairall, L R, Mahomed, O, Bateman, E D·2017·South African Medical Journal

Abstract

Evidence-based

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7196/samj.2017.v107i4.12413

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An adaptation of the ICCCF framework for evaluating the management of long term care for people with severe mental disorders in South Africa identified that poverty alleviation measures were an essential component of the intervention package.

    “An adaptation of the ICCCF framework for evaluating the management of long term care for people with severe mental disorders in South Africa identified that poverty alleviation measures were an essential component of the intervention package 69 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Fairall LR, Folb N, Timmerman V, et al. Educational outreach with an integrated clinical tool for nurse- led non-communicable chronic disease management in primary care in South Africa: A pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med 2016;13(11):e1002178. https://doi.org/10:1371/journal. pmed.1002178
  2. Olsen L, Aisner D, McGinnis JM. The Learning Healthcare System: Workshop Summary (IOM Roundtable on Evidence-Based Medicine). Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2007.
  3. S Afr Med J 2017;107(4):278-279. DOI:10.7196/SAMJ.2017.v107i4.12413

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fairall, L. R., Mahomed, O., & Bateman, E. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Venue
South African Medical Journal
Published
2017-03-29
Volume
107
Issue
4
Pages
278
ISSN
  • 0256-9574 (ISSN-L)
  • 2078-5135
OpenAlex
W2599967949
Cited by
7
References
8
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • South African Medical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
evidence-based decision making, primary care, pragmatic trials, clinical trial interpretation, clinical practice
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Health Policy, Humans, Primary Health Care, South Africa, Evidence-Based Medicine, Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review