Cited by 6Torture, Ethics, and LawEthics and bioethics in healthcareCriminal Law and Policy

Demandes d’euthanasie dans les prisons belges. Entre souffrance psychique, dignité humaine et peine de mort

Open access
Snacken, Sonja, Devynck, Caroline, Distelmans, Willem, Gutwirth, Serge, Lemmens, Christophe·2015·Criminologie

Abstract

En Belgique, l’euthanasie peut être appliquée légalement par des médecins à la demande expresse et répétée d’un patient qui se trouve dans une situation médicale sans issue et fait état d’une souffrance physique ou psychique constante et insupportable qui ne peut être apaisée et qui résulte d’une affection accidentelle ou pathologique grave et incurable. Au cours des deux dernières années, 17 demandes d’euthanasie ont été formulées par des détenus belges pour cause de souffrance psychique insupportable. Ils purgent tous une longue peine de prison ou une mesure de protection pour malades mentaux à durée indéterminée. Les auteurs examinent les questions éthiques, juridiques et criminologiques soulevées par ces demandes, car si les normes nationales et internationales garantissent aux détenus un droit à l’équivalence des soins médicaux, l’impact potentiel du contexte pénitentiaire sur leur souffrance psychique doit être pris en compte.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7202/1029350ar

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • During the last decade, 20 requests were registered from mentally ill offenders that were primarily based on psychological suffering.

    “during the last decade, 20 requests were registered from mentally ill offenders that were primarily based on psychological suffering (Gutwirth, Devynck, Lemmens, Distelmans, & Snacken, 2015;Witkowski, Hudson, Batson, Moore, & Mitchell, 2017).”

    From Psychiatric patients requesting euthanasia: Guidelines for sound clinical and ethical decision making (2019) · cites this paper as Gutwirth, Devynck, Lemmens, Distelmans, & Snacken, 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Snacken, S., Devynck, C., Distelmans, W., Gutwirth, S., & Lemmens, C.
Affiliations
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Venue
Criminologie
Published
2015-04-01
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
101-122
ISSN
  • 0316-0041 (ISSN-L)
  • 1492-1367
OpenAlex
W1806855619
Cited by
6
References
54
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
Locations
  • Criminologie (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Érudit (Université de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Torture, Ethics, and Law
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
Keywords
euthanasia requests, prisoners, Belgian prisons, psychological suffering, human dignity, death penalty, right to health care, mental illness, indeterminate sentences, ethics of euthanasia, criminal law

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review